Does a round 1 facility pickup trump a round 2 pickup?
Ex:
Controller A gets selected round 1 with facility XYZ priority number 200 but in round 2 gets selected from facility ZZZ with priority 6. Which facility would the controller go to.
I guess my question would be if 2 controller are at the same facility. Controller a gets select round 1 with a facility preference number of 200 and controller b gets selected round 2 but a facility preference of 3, who would be released? If controller a is selected round 1 , would that prevent any future controllers be prevented from being seen?It doesn’t trump it. The controller won’t be considered for round 2 if they were selected during round 1.
If the facility can only release 1, the moment controller A gets selected, no one else is eligible and they will not be considered. Controller B would not be looked at for the second round.I guess my question would be if 2 controller are at the same facility. Controller a gets select round 1 with a facility preference number of 200 and controller b gets selected round 2 but a facility preference of 3, who would be released? If controller a is selected round 1 , would that prevent any future controllers be prevented from being seen?
Pretty sure the inbounds and outbounds on that page are just taken from PPT committed columns.On the unofficial PPT updated weekly, there is only one column for ATCS inbound. Does that value = Committed ATCS + Placement list inbound (as indicated on the monthly PPT) or are they just showing the Committed ATCS?
The unofficial PPT simply grabs the data from the weekly staffing workbook updates that each facility controls. Placement list inbounds/outbounds are an HR function.On the unofficial PPT updated weekly, there is only one column for ATCS inbound. Does that value = Committed ATCS + Placement list inbound (as indicated on the monthly PPT) or are they just showing the Committed ATCS?
Correct, ERR's stay in the system until you are selected and accept a TOL from an MPP bid on USA Jobs.Does anybody know how applying to a bid on USAJOBS affects your ERRs and the NCEPT process?
I'm assuming your ERRs would stay in the system and be considered in the panel until you signed a TOL from a bid? Is it only after signing a TOL that they would be removed?
Thanks!
Losses are CPCs they can lose in NCEPT. Its not retirements. It's possible to ERR anywhere. But PHX is hard. Any well staffed facility is hard.Can anyone explain the rankings on the Priority Placement List? I've noticed some Cat 1 facilities with 0 possible gains that are highly ranked. Is this because of their possible losses? Are they ranked highly so they have better positioning in Round 2?
Ex:
CLT: priority #25
lvl 12, cat 1, 95.2% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 8 possible losses.
ZJX: priority #42
lvl 11, cat 1, 90.5% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 14 possible losses
PHX: priority #55
lvl 10, cat 1, 107.1% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 7 possible losses.
Are possible losses defined only as retirement? Sorry if this is a repeat question, I looked around but couldn't find a clear answer. Is it even possible to ERR to a facility like PHX that is over 100% staffed? If not, why are they even on the list?
Thanks!
10-12 facilities do not get to select in the second round. They can only select to the national average. Therefore, at this time, no it is not possible to ERR to PHX. They are listed because everyone is listed.Can anyone explain the rankings on the Priority Placement List? I've noticed some Cat 1 facilities with 0 possible gains that are highly ranked. Is this because of their possible losses? Are they ranked highly so they have better positioning in Round 2?
Ex:
CLT: priority #25
lvl 12, cat 1, 95.2% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 8 possible losses.
ZJX: priority #42
lvl 11, cat 1, 90.5% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 14 possible losses
PHX: priority #55
lvl 10, cat 1, 107.1% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 7 possible losses.
Are possible losses defined only as retirement? Sorry if this is a repeat question, I looked around but couldn't find a clear answer. Is it even possible to ERR to a facility like PHX that is over 100% staffed? If not, why are they even on the list?
Thanks!
Discussed in detail yesterday, read it starting here.Can anyone explain the rankings on the Priority Placement List? I've noticed some Cat 1 facilities with 0 possible gains that are highly ranked. Is this because of their possible losses? Are they ranked highly so they have better positioning in Round 2?
Ex:
CLT: priority #25
lvl 12, cat 1, 95.2% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 8 possible losses.
ZJX: priority #42
lvl 11, cat 1, 90.5% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 14 possible losses
PHX: priority #55
lvl 10, cat 1, 107.1% staffed as of 5/23/18
0 possible gains but 7 possible losses.
Are possible losses defined only as retirement? Sorry if this is a repeat question, I looked around but couldn't find a clear answer. Is it even possible to ERR to a facility like PHX that is over 100% staffed? If not, why are they even on the list?
Thanks!
It is possible to ERR to PHX. It is not possible to be selected by PHX this round. An ERR is a request.10-12 facilities do not get to select in the second round. They can only select to the national average. Therefore, at this time, no it is not possible to ERR to PHX. They are listed because everyone is listed.
True. You can put in paperwork anywhere but they will not be selected anyone.It is possible to ERR to PHX. It is not possible to be selected by PHX this round. An ERR is a request.
Points don't mean anything and have no bearing. Not wrong to fill them out or leave them blank, there's no impact either way.Does anyone have a definitive answer on the points system? I was told by the Southwest HR representative that it wasn't necessary to fill the points out; Then I spoke to the NATCA rep for ZLA and he said he wasn't aware about anything stating points weren't necessary and that I should fill them out on my paperwork.
Yes, standard procedure.