- Messages
- 483
- Facility
- N90 New York Tracon
Through the grapevine (and screenshots) I’ve become aware of an ATC posting blatant white supremacist remarks on Facebook. If this was brought up to your facility, how should it be handled?
I’ll take the unpopular stand here for a moment, everyone is entitled to have an opinion or personal belief. The beauty of this country is that anyone can believe anything they choose, even if it is an unpopular, morally wrong, and reprehensible point of view/opinion/belief. What you cannot do is use force or intimidation to coerce people into accepting your point of view/opinion/belief. The moment you cross that line and tell people they have to accept what you believe is the moment you are no better than they are. There are a quite a few issues I do not morally agree with but I tolerate them because this is America and it is every single persons inalienable right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness. *steps down soap box*
The moment you cross that line and tell people they have to accept what you believe is the moment you are no better than they are.
Cancel culture has eliminated everything you just said. Just look at what we are seeing everywhere right now. Look how many people are being doxxed, fired etc for things they've posted on social media including things posted years prior. Its terrifying.
including things posted years prior.
It was a rant about being pro-segregation.I don't know the exact context of those posts the OP was referring to
YikesIt was a rant about being pro-segregation.
It was a rant about being pro-segregation.
I agree completely, acting on it or speaking about it in a federal setting and not in the capacity as a private citizen are very difference scenarios. If it was posted on the employee's Facebook and on the employees own time by all means, should the employee advocate such views in a facility or on government time we enter a different realm entirely.As far as I understand White Supremicism, it falls into a discrimination category. So you're welcome to hold whatever belief you want, but to speak or act on it in a public setting will not fly.
It is a very sad culture we find ourselves in but we have rights, rights that guaranteed by our constitution. Doxxing people for exercising their right to such things is inherently dangerous... Remember those who spread fear in the name of righteousnessCancel culture has eliminated everything you just said. Just look at what we are seeing everywhere right now. Look how many people are being doxxed, fired etc for things they've posted on social media including things posted years prior. Its terrifying.
There's a big difference between "I'm proud of my culture even if celebrating it is frowned upon" (this is as mild as I can make it in case I misconstrue his words since I'm not reading it first hand) and "My ethnic group should live a different (and presumably better) life separate from other ethnic groups" (again, as mild). It's funny that so many people bring up the right to free speech especially when that speech is meant to express views that wish to hurt others. I don't think anyone invoked the right to free speech when they expressed views wanting to help others. (unless of course they talk about helping the enemies of the US lol)It was a rant about being pro-segregation.
There's pretty much no more difference between "job time" and "private time" anymore. Look at that woman in Central Park who got fired from her law firm for calling the police and lying that she was being choked by a black man because he asked her to put her dog on a leash.I agree completely, acting on it or speaking about it in a federal setting and not in the capacity as a private citizen are very difference scenarios. If it was posted on the employee's Facebook and on the employees own time by all means, should the employee advocate such views in a facility or on government time we enter a different realm entirely.
I take your point but to play devil's advocate, a person's views even if expressed outside of work can play a role in how they do their job. If training is a part of being a controller, let's say this individual treats trainees differently based on race in a way that is not obvious. That's a problem. Obviously we don't know the specifics of this situation, but my point is what an employee says and does outside of work can bring in to question their ability to do a job.I agree completely, acting on it or speaking about it in a federal setting and not in the capacity as a private citizen are very difference scenarios. If it was posted on the employee's Facebook and on the employees own time by all means, should the employee advocate such views in a facility or on government time we enter a different realm entirely.