Shoot The Breeze 3.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m surprised I didn’t hear anything about this. Does this mean we are guaranteed 30 days pay if the govt shuts down?
 

Attachments

  • 460FEE73-D3A2-46E1-A761-AC0C60C67699.jpeg
    460FEE73-D3A2-46E1-A761-AC0C60C67699.jpeg
    90.1 KB · Views: 50
What homsar will never post


 
Your downplaying the fact that if you are 6X less likely to get it you are 6X less likely to spread it

I’m not downplaying anything. Both that point and the point that we were lied to when we were told that vaccinated people spread Covid less can exist together. It’s just people like you who don’t want to admit it.


What homsar will never post



Oh look, non sequiturs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twn
JoeSchmoe said:
Question: airborne VFR aircraft requests IFR clearance to destination. Destination has TMU IS issued CFR. Do you request TMU for clearance and if so how do they issue a CFR to someone airborne?
 
Tell them to standby and ask TMU if they’re good to pick up their IFR or if they have to do something else like hold or continue vfr refile somewhere else
 
Your downplaying the fact that if you are 6X less likely to get it you are 6X less likely to spread it
CDC numbers are only based on data given which does not include those who have gotten the vaccine and are asymptomatic or have minor symptoms and therefore stay home and never get tested. They have also admitted that they are only counting breakthrough cases which end in hospitalization, so they arent counting any breakthrough cases that come from clinics, pharmacies, etc.

The "6x" number is a data-manipulated fallacy.
 
CDC numbers are only based on data given which does not include those who have gotten the vaccine and are asymptomatic or have minor symptoms and therefore stay home and never get tested. They have also admitted that they are only counting breakthrough cases which end in hospitalization, so they arent counting any breakthrough cases that come from clinics, pharmacies, etc.

The "6x" number is a data-manipulated fallacy.
A lot of non vaccinated people that are asymptomatic or are not severely sick don’t get tested either
 
Lefties are crying because some southwest pilot said “Let’s go Brandon,” and an AP reporter on the flight tried to storm the cockpit to get a comment from the crew ?


It’s also producing gold from people who are clutching their hypocritical pearls being offended but couldn’t help themselves when it came to Trump:

View attachment 7014
Looks like the science is changing on natural immunity

 
Wow, there sure seems to be a lot of "Breakthrough" cases ehhh. Just sayin'
iu
 
Last edited:
Looks like the science is changing on natural immunity


That one has been mixed in the scientific community, so I don’t mind conflicting evidence ending up having one theory succeed and one fail.

What I do mind, that I’ve repeated ad nauseum, is when it’s preached that the “science is settled” on something, with policies being formed based upon that, only to have the exact opposite thing be true barely a few months later. Case in point:

6E9D7C86-AD1E-43F0-896B-5FDEE0AA737C.jpeg

944E504F-B471-49B9-BF65-1BFBBCA868A6.jpeg

It’s one thing to use flimsy, tentative language and apologize after the fact if you’re wrong, but that’s not what’s happening.
 
That one has been mixed in the scientific community, so I don’t mind conflicting evidence ending up having one theory succeed and one fail.

What I do mind, that I’ve repeated ad nauseum, is when it’s preached that the “science is settled” on something, with policies being formed based upon that, only to have the exact opposite thing be true barely a few months later. Case in point:

View attachment 7016

View attachment 7017

It’s one thing to use flimsy, tentative language and apologize after the fact if you’re wrong, but that’s not what’s happening.
No they are lying over and over and over again and again! AND MORE PEOPLE ARE DYING UNDER BIDEN WITH THE THREE VACCINES THAN UNDER TRUMP WHEN HE HAD NONE TO WORK WITH! What happened to the Herd Immunity? I would ask 32 Below about this but I bet he is out today so he can get his 3rd Booster Shot.
 
No they are lying over and over and over again and again! AND MORE PEOPLE ARE DYING UNDER BIDEN WITH THE THREE VACCINES THAN UNDER TRUMP WHEN HE HAD NONE TO WORK WITH! What happened to the Herd Immunity? I would ask 32 Below about this but I bet he is out today so he can get his 3rd Booster Shot.
Whose dying? I haven’t died. You have died? How do we know anyone is dying?
 
No they are lying over and over and over again and again! AND MORE PEOPLE ARE DYING UNDER BIDEN WITH THE THREE VACCINES THAN UNDER TRUMP WHEN HE HAD NONE TO WORK WITH! What happened to the Herd Immunity? I would ask 32 Below about this but I bet he is out today so he can get his 3rd Booster Shot.
This isn’t the own you think it is.
 
You mean more unvaccinated people who aren’t following any preventative measures anymore are dying even though there is 3 vaccines available because they’re fucking stupid
You clowns keep spreading the false narrative that these vaccines are safe and effective! How effective are they? You have 70% or more of the population vaccinated and three vaccines available to anyone for free and the DEATH RATE HAS RISEN! More people are dying! You guys are pawns spreading the lies!

I hope sleepy Joe doesn't get any new ideas from his good friend:
 
  • Like
Reactions: twn
That one has been mixed in the scientific community, so I don’t mind conflicting evidence ending up having one theory succeed and one fail.

What I do mind, that I’ve repeated ad nauseum, is when it’s preached that the “science is settled” on something, with policies being formed based upon that, only to have the exact opposite thing be true barely a few months later. Case in point:

View attachment 7016

View attachment 7017

It’s one thing to use flimsy, tentative language and apologize after the fact if you’re wrong, but that’s not what’s happening.
I think the issue here is your misunderstanding of how science works. Outside of scientific laws, science is never settled. You draw a conclusion based on the data you have at the time. Then if things change or get more data you reassess and draw another conclusion. You can keep up with your 'moving the goalposts' cliche b.s. but life changes and the science moves with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom