And hell yea you need to get into NFA Peter. Once you shoot suppressed you won’t want to go back. Plus I love my tacti-cool SBR and I’m a boss at clearing my house though I don’t have any multicam… And wasn’t Cheney the shotgun specialist?
Ya the 12.5in "pistol" becoming a rifle is first on the list, just haven't gotten around to doing the paperwork yet. Suppressor is happening at some point probably in the next year, looking into 30 cal options that'll work on my deer rifle as well.
This is something a beta would say
What that I don't need some device to make me feel like a man? Mmmkay, do the micropeen pills come in strawberry flavor?
Funny how you ignore the only post posting two sources refuting the argument you’ve tirelessly repeated over the course of many posts. It’s like poetry.
Not ignoring, I read it, I've already made my position clear, and not responding. There is a difference.
It’s not. This was your exact quote, which was such a silly opinion that I didn’t even bother to reply to it:
It's not at all.
You literally think giving someone a .22lr firearm, made in a caliber that produces very little kinetic energy, is teaching them killing fundamentals.
Again, no, not the point I was making, which was throwing lead at high speed from a firearm was made a thing for a reason and it wasn't punching paper, as much as yes, that is an enjoyable activity.
The problem is you not being able to divorce what came before the situation from the situation itself. That’s not how the law works, and it’s so tiresome reading about people who think it does work like that.
In fact thats exactly how it works in many situations in many places, reference every bar fight where someone ends up in jail on manslaughter charges, or a great many shootings, stabbings etc. State of mind and extenuating circumstances absolutely come to play in many court cases. I'm no lawyer, neither are you, but it doesn't take much looking into current events to see that.
Thinking that the use of a .22lr firearm at a range to shoot holes in paper is training for murder is absolutely a fudd thing to think, as well as thinking that someone loses the right to self defense if they make a decision to enter an avoidable situation.
Last I checked the definition of a "fudd" was an typically older, right wing, nra sticker having dude who thinks all guns should be wood and steel and only used for hunting and target shooting, is for assault weapons bans, and thinks anything designed last 1955 is utter trash.
Last I checked I'm none of those things besides nearing the older category a little more everyday lmao, though yes I enjoy the fuck out of some old fashioned wood and steel hunting implements and think old stuff is fun and cool too.
But cool you wanna label me with some made up meme culture gun term.....sure I guess knock yourself out?
