Shoot The Breeze 3.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember when the tuscon cop shot a dude for shoplifting?

Nine times

In the back

With an intentional headshot

While he was rolling away in his hoverround?
You mean the dude with a knife hoverrounding his way into the Lowes after threatening the Walmart employee?

Can't treat him any different then someone without a disability says the ADA!

Police need to be issued a portable set of stairs in case it happens again.
 
You mean the dude with a knife hoverrounding his way into the Lowes after threatening the Walmart employee?

Can't treat him any different then someone without a disability says the ADA!

Police need to be issued a portable set of stairs in case it happens again.
Yep that's the guy. I dunno about you but I've never felt threatened for my life by an old man slowly rolling away from me in an electric scooter. Any in danger civilians could simply execute the run portion of run hide fight.... at a brisk walk, and according to the lawyer he was "too close to deploy the taser safely".

Okay, like wait 3 seconds. He's literally rolling away from you. Don't even need to move. Literally stand still till you have have extra standoff room you need. At the 3mph the electric scooter moves at you'll have it in a matter of seconds.

Takes a really mindless bootlicker to defend that shoot. How does kiwi polish taste? Do you prefer basic black or the extra shiny clear coat?
 
Yep that's the guy. I dunno about you but I've never felt threatened for my life by an old man slowly rolling away from me in an electric scooter. Any in danger civilians could simply execute the run portion of run hide fight.... at a brisk walk, and according to the lawyer he was "too close to deploy the taser safely".

Okay, like wait 3 seconds. He's literally rolling away from you. Don't even need to move. Literally stand still till you have have extra standoff room you need. At the 3mph the electric scooter moves at you'll have it in a matter of seconds.

Takes a really mindless bootlicker to defend that shoot. How does kiwi polish taste? Do you prefer basic black or the extra shiny clear coat?
I'm not defending the officers actions. I just stated facts.

If you want my opinion though..... an asshole cop did a shitty thing and murdered a mentally unstable thief. 1 bad act removes 2 shitty people from society. Society wins?
 
I'm not defending the officers actions. I just stated facts.

If you want my opinion though..... an asshole cop did a shitty thing and murdered a mentally unstable thief. 1 bad act removes 2 shitty people from society. Society wins?
I was unaware being mentally unstable and a petty thief were punishable by extrajudicial death sentence. My bad.
 

Pretty unlikely bedfellows…a coalition like this really makes you wonder what Biden’s DOJ is trying to cover up.
Journalists want information released so they can give an accurate accounting of a story. Am I supposed to be upset about this?
 
Journalists want information released so they can give an accurate accounting of a story. Am I supposed to be upset about this?

The uber-Left wing media is going nuts over Bannon’s request, saying he’s trying to politicize the trial. They want to cover for Biden’s shady DOJ even when the MSM doesn’t.


I’m waiting for 32 to come in here to run cover for the DOJ too.
 
The uber-Left wing media is going nuts over Bannon’s request, saying he’s trying to politicize the trial. They want to cover for Biden’s shady DOJ even when the MSM doesn’t.


I’m waiting for 32 to come in here to run cover for the DOJ too.
Dude you are insane. Take a break.
 
The uber-Left wing media is going nuts over Bannon’s request, saying he’s trying to politicize the trial. They want to cover for Biden’s shady DOJ even when the MSM doesn’t.


I’m waiting for 32 to come in here to run cover for the DOJ too.
Wait so I'm trying to get at what your point is here without buying all the black Friday leftover straw....

So you are saying the media is covering for the DOJ, while at the same time arguing FOR the release of the info DOJ doesn't want released? Seems those two don't really jibe with one another.

Sounds like you need to pick an opinion.

One daily beast article analyzing the possible Bannon strategy isn't covering for anyone.... it's explaining what they speculate to be going on as far as a possible legal strategy of obfuscation, and as we've seen in the past from Bannon amd company, the longer info is out the more time they have to spin and force a narrative. We saw that tactic for the last 5 years or so, I'm not shocked at all by the tactic. Media circuses work well for them, when all the patriotic red blooded Americans get thier news from opinion man tucker Carlson.

I don't think this is what you think it is. It's likely less "see look at these deep state FBI agents in khakis and aviators who were undercover in the crowd inciting people to violence" or something and more DOJ doesn't want this to become an out of control media circus like the last 27 times members of the Trump circle have been brought before congress or a judge.

If I'm off base on that feel free to tell me what you think the DOJ is hiding. There's video evidence of the who what and when of that day. I'd be curious to see what the DOJ has on it we don't know personally, regardless of if it shows the Trump camp had an active role or whether it was the lizard people from below the earths crust.
 
Wait so I'm trying to get at what your point is here without buying all the black Friday leftover straw....

So you are saying the media is covering for the DOJ, while at the same time arguing FOR the release of the info DOJ doesn't want released? Seems those two don't really jibe with one another.

I’m saying that radical Left wingers who would do anything to cover for Biden are against Bannon wanting to release documents of public interest that could shed some light on exactly what they’re charging for. I’m pleasantly surprised the MSM isn’t joining the radicals. Information wants to be free, yo.

One daily beast article analyzing the possible Bannon strategy isn't covering for anyone.... it's explaining what they speculate to be going on as far as a possible legal strategy of obfuscation, and as we've seen in the past from Bannon amd company, the longer info is out the more time they have to spin and force a narrative. We saw that tactic for the last 5 years or so, I'm not shocked at all by the tactic.
There’s lots of articles seemingly taking the DOJ side on this, from multiple sources.



The article I posted explained it well:

“The public has an overwhelming interest in the facts, circumstances and causes of the Jan. 6 riot,” the coalition said in its brief. “Bannon has been indicted in an investigation of the riot and has demonstrated his desire to communicate with the press and public about the government’s case against him.”

This might be a sign than the “insurrection” narrative isn’t as strong as we keep being told. I’m glad they referred to it in the brief from what the evidence shows it was, a riot.

Media circuses work well for them, when all the patriotic red blooded Americans get thier news from opinion man tucker Carlson.

Ironically, Fox isn’t a party to the coalition.

I don't think this is what you think it is. It's likely less "see look at these deep state FBI agents in khakis and aviators who were undercover in the crowd inciting people to violence" or something and more DOJ doesn't want this to become an out of control media circus like the last 27 times members of the Trump circle have been brought before congress or a judge.

Naa, I’m going with something more like the former. I’m still waiting for a single charge/conviction of a charge related to insurrection/sedition.

If I'm off base on that feel free to tell me what you think the DOJ is hiding. There's video evidence of the who what and when of that day. I'd be curious to see what the DOJ has on it we don't know personally, regardless of if it shows the Trump camp had an active role or whether it was the lizard people from below the earths crust.

See above. This is another Russian Collusion hoax, in my eyes, and it might be starting to fall apart.
 
I’m saying that radical Left wingers who would do anything to cover for Biden are against Bannon wanting to release documents of public interest that could shed some light on exactly what they’re charging for. I’m pleasantly surprised the MSM isn’t joining the radicals. Information wants to be free, yo.
I'm gonna blow your mind here but "radical" left wingers hate biden about as much as conservstives do. Almost. This assertion that biden is anything but milquetoast moderate/centrist Democrat in anything but lipservice amd do nothing feelgood shit wild.

I agree info wants to be free. I'm all for releasing it, mostly because the biden administration doesn't have a spine and the public needs to know so we can do a better job in the future of avoiding such things and hold our leaders accountable.

There’s lots of articles seemingly taking the DOJ side on this, from multiple sources.



I don't see anything super opinionated in either of those. Seems like a basic accounting of statements, from both sides.
The article I posted explained it well:
Yes I agree with thier sentiment, because Bannon has a vested interest in making it a circus. That's what he does best. Plenty of quotes from him about media chaos being beneficial to his strategies.
This might be a sign than the “insurrection” narrative isn’t as strong as we keep being told. I’m glad they referred to it in the brief from what the evidence shows it was, a riot.
It can be both riot and insurrection, if it was a planned riot with an end goal.

Ironically, Fox isn’t a party to the coalition.
They don't need to be, half thier network has direct ties to the Bannon camp and has for some time. They'll get the leaks they need to spin thier narrative.
Naa, I’m going with something more like the former.
To what end? He had already lost the election, he was on his way out....why would the deepstate actors (who also rigged the election?) Incite a riot to detain some fash goons and bumpkins? For what? And not a single person in any of these historically pretty conservative law enforcement agencies had anything to say on that level of impropriety?

Thats also discounting everything we do know, and the objective fact that trump told them to go there and he was gonna meet them there. The administration's response in the hours after is particularly telling to me that at a minimum they had no interest in stopping the "riot", and were more than okay with what was going on.

As Trump himself said, it's common sense to want to hang Mike Pence.

Straight tinfoil hat crackpot territory my man. Watch that fluoride now, shit will get ya.

I’m still waiting for a single charge/conviction of a charge related to insurrection/sedition.
Little fish little charge. Time will tell I guess.
See above. This is another Russian Collusion hoax, in my eyes, and it might be starting to fall apart.
So a media circus that if covered and handled better probably would have resulted in more charges than it did of bigger figures? The one that resulted in charges of people in trumps inner circle, and eventual pardons by the big man himself? I'll buy that, in fact it's a great template for Bannon to follow on this wouldn't you think?
 
I'm gonna blow your mind here but "radical" left wingers hate biden about as much as conservstives do. Almost.
Lets Go Reaction GIF


It still boggles my mind how conservatives simultaneously say he's not all there or coherent, he's actively turning our country into a socialist hellscape, he's really just a puppet for "woke" AOC and The Squad, he cowers to Manchin and Sinema, and Bernie has him over a barrel.

Like, please, just pick one or two and stick with it.

And here's a hint: if you stick with the "he's not all there or coherent" and the "he cowers to Manchin and Sinema" you're not going to be met with disagreement from the ACTUAL left.

We sure as hell didn't want wish.com Clint Eastwood.
 
Anybody in here watched Dopesick on Hulu or read the book? Share your thoughts. I read the book 4-5 year ago and the series is living up to the book
 
Lets Go Reaction GIF


It still boggles my mind how conservatives simultaneously say he's not all there or coherent, he's actively turning our country into a socialist hellscape, he's really just a puppet for "woke" AOC and The Squad, he cowers to Manchin and Sinema, and Bernie has him over a barrel.

Like, please, just pick one or two and stick with it.

And here's a hint: if you stick with the "he's not all there or coherent" and the "he cowers to Manchin and Sinema" you're not going to be met with disagreement from the ACTUAL left.

We sure as hell didn't want wish.com Clint Eastwood.
Everything to the left of old school John McCain conservatism is authoritarian state communism these days, and it makes it super hard to have a conversation about real issues when half the country lives in a totally separate reality like that. It's good for that donor class status quo though, so all is right in the world.

Also, 1954 called they want thier boogeyman back.

Woke corporatism mainstream Democrat politicians are the same as Republicans, they just pay lipservice to a different voter base, change my mind.
 
Everything to the left of old school John McCain conservatism is authoritarian state communism these days, and it makes it super hard to have a conversation about real issues when half the country lives in a totally separate reality like that. It's good for that donor class status quo though, so all is right in the world.

Also, 1954 called they want thier boogeyman back.

Woke corporatism mainstream Democrat politicians are the same as Republicans, they just pay lipservice to a different voter base, change my mind.
the best part is how the super Republican states soak up social programs and taxpayer funds like no other
 
Woke corporatism mainstream Democrat politicians are the same as Republicans, they just pay lipservice to a different voter base, change my mind.
Why would I change your mind when you're already correct?

GOP and DNC smile while they have people fighting over whether or not they want a corporatist or a woke corporatist in power while they continue to accumulate more and more wealth and screw over anyone who can't live exorbitantly off of stock dividends, overall market growth, and other large-scale passive income streams.

Meet the old boss, same as the gender neutral non-binary new boss.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom