Shoot The Breeze 3.0

[Uglytaco]

Everything they’ve reported so far has been true. Russia has tried to do 3 shitty false flags already

Also what should be done with trump for stealing classified documents? But her emails amirite

I haven’t kept up with that, but if he broke the law then prove it in court and prosecute him. DNC was just caught on the Russia conspiracy, but who paid the hackers to invent the Russia hoax?

 

[32andBelow]

I haven’t kept up with that

What are the odds

 

[Peter Gibbons]

1. This admin is trying to freak people out to try to start another war, or pretending they know what’s going on and what Putin is thinking.
2. Americans will believe this propaganda and possibly want US involvement even tho we can’t secure our own border. *war is profit*
3. Nothing happens.
4. Biden will pretend he stopped a war and pat himself in the back to wash off his failures in Afghanistan last summer (some people might have already forgotten).
5. Some Americans will believe his propaganda.

If you think the US or NATO is gonna involve themselves in this beyond what they are currently doing, barring an incursion against a NATO Ally.....you need to lay off the Hunter Biden party favors bruh. Ww3 would he bad for the economy and even sleepy Joe knows that.

Lots of propoganda talk coming from someone whose over here repeating Tucker Carlson's talking points too, lol.

Russia is our friend and Biden and the Dems are evil amiright?

What are the odds

It's only bad when it's the other guy.... C'mon now we know this already.

 

[Uglytaco]

It's only bad when it's the other guy.... C'mon now we know this already.

Hahahaha

 

[MikeSierra]

It's only bad when it's the other guy.... C'mon now we know this already.

Good and evil isn't decided based on your political ideologies.

If your family is involved with offshore money laundering and your crackhead son is clearly selling painting for under-the-table payments, you might be on the side of evil.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Good and evil isn't decided based on your political ideologies.

If your family is involved with offshore money laundering and your crackhead son is clearly selling painting for under-the-table payments, you might be on the side of evil.

I totally agree with you on all counts.

Now practice what you preach.

So on that note, you should definitely have also added in if you and 2 of your children are currently under investigation for tax fraud in the state you miraculously made all your money in before skipping down to Florida, and you also have a long (and actually confirmed) history of shady foreign money deals you may also be on the side of evil too yes? Or is that JuSt BeInG sMaRt aNd GaMiNg ThE sYsTeM?

I mean you can play the whattaboutism game all you want, it's still laughably hypocritical of you.

 

[MikeSierra]

whattaboutism

Wtf are you talking about? I never said "what about" to anything nor did I mention anything to be hypocritical. The family you're talking about isn't in office or relevant right now. Are you upset I didn't say tRuMp Is bAd or something?
You're strange, man. Like you have two heads or something. One fighting the other over right and wrong.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Wtf are you talking about? I never said "what about" to anything nor did I mention anything to be hypocritical. The family you're talking about isn't in office or relevant right now. Are you upset I didn't say tRuMp Is bAd or something?
You're strange, man. Like you have two heads or something. One fighting the other over right and wrong.

I'm just saying you can't have your cake and eat it too, and all those allegations were also being made when they were relevant. The things some of yall like to pearl clutch over didn't bother you not too long ago, or vice versa, be it shady international business practices or blocking roads as a valid form of protest, etc. I don't think it's strange or two faced to call that out at all.

If anything at least I'm consistent in my views of right and wrong, it doesn't change based on whether it's my political "team" or not.

 

[ClearanceClarence]

So when’s this WWIII everyone keeps talking about supposed to start? If it does, does that mean we can forget about COVID and get back to training?

 

[Peter Gibbons]

So when’s this WWIII everyone keeps talking about supposed to start? If it does, does that mean we can forget about COVID and get back to training?

 

[ClearanceClarence]

View attachment 7412

In all seriousness though, IMO, the way the Administration has handled all this has been awful. When you constantly push a Russian attack is “imminent,” “coming any moment,” “Putin’s made up his mind,” for weeks at a time - but then nothing happens - it degrades credibility on the world stage. It shows either our intel isn’t as reliable as they think it as, or they’re overhyping things for whatever reason. Not saying that nothing will happen, but the constant “it’s about to happen” narrative loses effectiveness very quickly. Obviously you want to take precautions like asking citizens to leave, moving the embassy, etc. but the constant fear-porn onslaught from officials at every Department is draining. If anything, it’s going to provoke aggression from the Russians. With the Administration insisting an invasion is coming, if Putin did decide to nothing now, he would come across as weak. And they’ve already shown all their cards by stating there would be no American troop intervention and sanctions would be the main response. How does telling the enemy exactly what you’re going to do and not do help persuade them towards your interests?

And the mixed messaging doesn’t help either. Today the Pentagon said “Russian President Vladimir Putin] has not conducted another invasion in Ukraine yet, and we still think there's time to prevent that” but Biden himself said days ago that Putin “had decided” to invade. So which one is it? We’re embarrassing ourselves on the world stage right now.

 

[Billybob]

In all seriousness though, IMO, the way the Administration has handled all this has been awful. When you constantly push a Russian attack is “imminent,” “coming any moment,” “Putin’s made up his mind,” for weeks at a time - but then nothing happens - it degrades credibility on the world stage. It shows either our intel isn’t as reliable as they think it as, or they’re overhyping things for whatever reason. Not saying that nothing will happen, but the constant “it’s about to happen” narrative loses effectiveness very quickly. Obviously you want to take precautions like asking citizens to leave, moving the embassy, etc. but the constant fear-porn onslaught from officials at every Department is draining. If anything, it’s going to provoke aggression from the Russians. With the Administration insisting an invasion is coming, if Putin did decide to nothing now, he would come across as weak. And they’ve already shown all their cards by stating there would be no American troop intervention and sanctions would be the main response. How does telling the enemy exactly what you’re going to do and not do help persuade them towards your interests?

I think there is enough intel to show that an invasion is highly likely or imminent. It took the U.S. almost two years to invade Europe after they landed in England. How long have the troops been at the border? A couple of weeks? Russia has already shown aggression by moving their troops to surround Ukraine on 3 sides and by planting false flag attacks.

 

[ClearanceClarence]

I think there is enough intel to show that an invasion is highly likely or imminent. It took the U.S. almost two years to invade Europe after they landed in England. How long have the troops been at the border? A couple of weeks? Russia has already shown aggression by moving their troops to surround Ukraine on 3 sides and by planting false flag attacks.

I don’t disagree, I just don’t see the advantage of broadcasting the intelligence on every news network every day essentially saying it’s happening any moment when it is clear these things take time.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

In all seriousness though, IMO, the way the Administration has handled all this has been awful. When you constantly push a Russian attack is “imminent,” “coming any moment,” “Putin’s made up his mind,” for weeks at a time - but then nothing happens - it degrades credibility on the world stage. It shows either our intel isn’t as reliable as they think it as, or they’re overhyping things for whatever reason. Not saying that nothing will happen, but the constant “it’s about to happen” narrative loses effectiveness very quickly. Obviously you want to take precautions like asking citizens to leave, moving the embassy, etc. but the constant fear-porn onslaught from officials at every Department is draining. If anything, it’s going to provoke aggression from the Russians. With the Administration insisting an invasion is coming, if Putin did decide to nothing now, he would come across as weak. And they’ve already shown all their cards by stating there would be no American troop intervention and sanctions would be the main response. How does telling the enemy exactly what you’re going to do and not do help persuade them towards your interests?

And the mixed messaging doesn’t help either. Today the Pentagon said “Russian President Vladimir Putin] has not conducted another invasion in Ukraine yet, and we still think there's time to prevent that” but Biden himself said days ago that Putin “had decided” to invade. So which one is it? We’re embarrassing ourselves on the world stage right now.

Alternative viewpoint....they are getting good Intel and have been overwhelmingly right on a lot of things from buildup size, locations, to the false flag cassus belli, and putting it all out there is causing delays and alterations to the plan on behalf of the Russians.

It's more than likely coming after the closing of the Olympics, Putin can't risk pissing off his likely new primary trading partner. If it doesn't happen at all that's great news though. Little egg on the face is better than the biggest land war in Europe since WW2. I don't think it's "just training exercises" (it's like 60 percent of their fighting force and men and materiel from all over the place) and I don't think all the posturing and random acts of "terrorism" happening in e Ukraine right now while said giant buildup on the border is a coincidence either, and riling up the separatists and Russia would he incredibly stupid if Ukraine was in fact behind the shelling and bombings. That'd just be stupid.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

 

[Billybob]

 

[32andBelow]

Wtf are you talking about? I never said "what about" to anything nor did I mention anything to be hypocritical. The family you're talking about isn't in office or relevant right now. Are you upset I didn't say tRuMp Is bAd or something?
You're strange, man. Like you have two heads or something. One fighting the other over right and wrong.

Because you guys say all this stuff about hunter non stop. But the great news for you and the world is Biden doesn’t make his kids advisors in his administration.

 

[BPM31694]

I'm just saying you can't have your cake and eat it too, and all those allegations were also being made when they were relevant. The things some of yall like to pearl clutch over didn't bother you not too long ago, or vice versa, be it shady international business practices or blocking roads as a valid form of protest, etc. I don't think it's strange or two faced to call that out at all.

If anything at least I'm consistent in my views of right and wrong, it doesn't change based on whether it's my political "team" or not.

“Fiery, but mostly peaceful”

Yeah real consistent with your views of right and wrong lol.

The problem with you leftists is the ends justify the means with the whole “protesting” thing.

As long as you are fighting for racial justice you can burn down a few buildings and loot some businesses because ya know….lives over property! Those businesses have insurance so who cares!

Say what you want about the trucker convoy, it’s been peaceful…..not mostly peaceful, but peaceful.

 

[32andBelow]

“Fiery, but mostly peaceful”

Yeah real consistent with your views of right and wrong lol.

The problem with you leftists is the ends justify the means with the whole “protesting” thing.

As long as you are fighting for racial justice you can burn down a few buildings and loot some businesses because ya know….lives over property! Those businesses have insurance so who cares!

Say what you want about the trucker convoy, it’s been peaceful…..not mostly peaceful, but peaceful.

Nah the people that burned down the buildings were criminals and got arrested. And the cops cleared those protests immediately. Not weeks later

Also what’s up with calling people leftists. What does that even mean. Kind of sounds bad.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

“Fiery, but mostly peaceful”

Yeah real consistent with your views of right and wrong lol.

The problem with you leftists is the ends justify the means with the whole “protesting” thing.

As long as you are fighting for racial justice you can burn down a few buildings and loot some businesses because ya know….lives over property! Those businesses have insurance so who cares!

Say what you want about the trucker convoy, it’s been peaceful…..not mostly peaceful, but peaceful.

And I am (was at this point?) All for what our friendly neighbors to the north are doing..... Protest to affect change on your society when other means aren't working is totally fine in my book, and sometimes civil disobedience gets a little spicy. That's freedom baby! The other half of that is being willing to suffer the consequences for that disobedience when it doesn't go your way, which seems to be something the left does well and the right cries about, I will say that much.

So what's your point?