Shoot The Breeze 3.0

[Logical_Mongoose]

That sure did age like spilled milk.

Does spilt milk age quicker than unspilt? I mean, unspilt milk is likely contained in some form of a vessel, which therefore gives it a more concentrated gravitational mass; and the stronger an object's gravitational field is the slower time passes in proximity to it. But is it really that noticeable when compared to the weak gravitational mass of spilt milk?

Homsar over here considering ALL the variables and thinking into the 5th dimension compared to us smooth-brains.

 

[AB19]

Does spilt milk age quicker than unspilt? I mean, unspilt milk is likely contained in some form of a vessel, which therefore gives it a more concentrated gravitational mass; and the stronger an object's gravitational field is the slower time passes in proximity to it. But is it really that noticeable when compared to the weak gravitational mass of spilt milk?

Homsar over here considering ALL the variables and thinking into the 5th dimension compared to us smooth-brains.

I know this is trying to be funny but if the mass is the same than so is the force applied by either

 

[32andBelow]

Beto’s standing by his gun grabbing comments in 2019.

O’Rourke stands by his ‘we’re gonna take your AR-15, your AK-47’ comment

Democratic Texas gubernatorial candidate Beto O’Rourke on Sunday said he stands by his controversial 2019 comment that “we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47.”Asked by co-host Dana …

thehill.com

Pepperidge Farm remembers the days where gun grabbers tirelessly repeated “no one wants to take your guns.” That sure did age like spilled milk.

This guy isn’t even in office

 

[Logical_Mongoose]

I know this is trying to be funny but if the mass is the same than so is the force applied by either

My high school science/physics is trying to kick into gear: isn't mass in Einstein's general relativity different than mass in special relativity? I thought Einstein's model had different factors/variables for mass not typically included in special relativity, or am I crossing the wires?

I remember one of my teachers saying something along the lines that if the earth was stretched to only 1 inch on any of the x/y/z axis it would retain its overall mass but lose almost all of its gravitational force on objects: that image stuck in my brain and now I am wondering if it was bullshit all along...

 

[AB19]

My high school science/physics is trying to kick into gear: isn't mass in Einstein's general relativity different than mass in special relativity? I thought Einstein's model had different factors/variables for mass not typically included in special relativity, or am I crossing the wires?

I remember one of my teachers saying something along the lines that if the earth was stretched to only 1 inch on any of the x/y/z axis it would retain its overall mass but lose almost all of its gravitational force on objects: that image stuck in my brain and now I am wondering if it was bullshit all along...

At least from what I remember in physics the gravitational force on objects has to deal with the distance between them and their mass, but you always use the center of the object not it’s outermost point, so the size would not matter

 

[Homsar]

This guy isn’t even in office

What’s your point?

 

[Logical_Mongoose]

At least from what I remember in physics the gravitational force on objects has to deal with the distance between them and their mass, but you always use the center of the object not it’s outermost point, so the size would not matter

This is what I get for trying to make a half-assed smartass joke about milk.

 

[Billybob]

 

[Logical_Mongoose]

Beto’s standing by his gun grabbing comments in 2019.

This guy isn’t even in office

What’s your point?

Wasn't dude an immediate flop in the primaries? Pretty sure it was shown that his donors were from DC and virtually no support from Texas; no one outside of DC likes him and he's just a poster boy for the right to fear-sturbate to.

 

[32andBelow]

What’s your point?

It’s absolutely irrelevant. Your proving the left wants to take all your guns cus some guy that isn’t even in office said do.

Trump wants to ruin democracy but he’s not in office so I don’t care

 

[Mike Kilo]

It’s absolutely irrelevant. Your proving the left wants to take all your guns cus some guy that isn’t even in office said do.

Trump wants to ruin democracy but he’s not in office so I don’t care

For someone who doesn’t care you sure bring him up a lot.

 

[Homsar]

Wasn't dude an immediate flop in the primaries? Pretty sure it was shown that his donors were from DC and virtually no support from Texas; no one outside of DC likes him and he's just a poster boy for the right to fear-sturbate to.

Yeah, because he has no appeal whatsoever, and he’s an extremist psycho. He still proves the “no one wants to take your guns” claim is a lie, though.

It’s absolutely irrelevant. Your proving the left wants to take all your guns cus some guy that isn’t even in office said do.

Straw must be on sale again. I’m simply saying that I’ve been told for decades that “no one wants to take your guns,” and anyone who says otherwise is a conspiracy theorist. Clearly Beto proves that was a lie.

Trump wants to ruin democracy but he’s not in office so I don’t care

Whataboutism.

 

[32andBelow]

Yeah, because he has no appeal whatsoever, and he’s an extremist psycho. He still proves the “no one wants to take your guns” claim is a lie, though.



Straw must be on sale again. I’m simply saying that I’ve been told for decades that “no one wants to take your guns,” and anyone who says otherwise is a conspiracy theorist. Clearly Beto proves that was a lie.




Whataboutism.

Psychos that aren’t even in office prove your point? Yikes

 

[DankVectorz]

I’m simply saying that I’ve been told for decades that “no one wants to take your guns,” and anyone who says otherwise is a conspiracy theorist. Clearly Beto proves that was a lie.

I’ve been told for decades Republicans aren’t racist but David Duke says he is so clearly that was a lie.

 

[Homsar]

Psychos that aren’t even in office prove your point? Yikes

Yeah, because he’s someone who wants to take my guns. I don’t know why this is so hard for you to accept.

I’ve been told for decades Republicans aren’t racist but David Duke says he is so clearly that was a lie.

I mean, yeah? That means “Republicans can be racist,” as you found. It doesn’t mean all of them are, just like not all Democrats want to take guns away. This isn’t that hard…?

 

[32andBelow]

Yeah, because he’s someone who wants to take my guns. I don’t know why this is so hard for you to accept.


I mean, yeah? That means “Republicans can be racist,” as you found. It doesn’t mean all of them are, just like not all Democrats want to take guns away. This isn’t that hard…?

You can find people in every party with every point of view. Why’s are you so obsessed with this guy. You act like he speaks for every single democrat. Does Liz Chaney speak for every Republican?

 

[Homsar]

You can find people in every party with every point of view. Why’s are you so obsessed with this guy. You act like he speaks for every single democrat. Does Liz Chaney speak for every Republican?

Because he said something that disproves decades of gun control advocates saying “No wants to take your guns.” I feel like I’m talking to a brick wall again.

In other news, the police confirmed the person rumored to have caused the attack last night, and they blew a hole in the very dismissive-sounding argument that he just happened to be fleeing a scene while being chased and took a wrong turn. He intentionally attacked the parade, and has a history of attacking people with cars and racist posts. Disgusting person, and I’m wondering if the media fanning the racial tension flames with the Rittenhouse verdict these last few days inspired him.

 

[Logical_Mongoose]

Homsar & Beto = 32andBelow & Trump

 

[32andBelow]

Homsar & Beto = 32andBelow & Trump

I don’t post stupid star man shit totally unprovoked. I only post about vaccines

 

[rhombus]

Because he said something that disproves decades of gun control advocates saying “No wants to take your guns.” I feel like I’m talking to a brick wall again.

In other news, the police confirmed the person rumored to have caused the attack last night, and they blew a hole in the very dismissive-sounding argument that he just happened to be fleeing a scene while being chased and took a wrong turn. He intentionally attacked the parade, and has a history of attacking people with cars and racist posts. Disgusting person, and I’m wondering if the media fanning the racial tension flames with the Rittenhouse verdict these last few days inspired him.

While we’re speculating, maybe he was driving really fast away from all the Democrats trying to take his guns. I’m wondering if all this posting on .65 inspired him. Maybe it was PT