Shoot The Breeze

Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean that's the law enforcement side of the story, eyewitness accounts differ is my understanding as far as who announced themselves and who shot first.

And you should crack a history book, and search the origins of antifa, along with who actually won ww2. If you are buying the American exceptionalism version of how the war was won, you are missing out on the realities of the situation.

Long story short, the war was over before any Americans hit the beaches at Normandy.
Reinoehl was wanted for murder, had a gun on him, ran from police and shot at them first. Why would he go to jail willingly? He wanted to be a martyr, he is %100 ANTIFA by his own words.

I know the origins of Antifaschisitsche Aktion, a communist organization to fight off fascisim and it couldn't be more meaningless. Look at their current actions and how many nazi's do you see them fighting in our streets? I know that they will attack any police officer or conservative they see if they think they can get away with it. They have done more damage to small business and hurt more people than fascism has in the US. No one can say what would happen if the US didnt enter WW2, we were giving aid to the allies far before we were officially in the war, so take that back and more than likely they would have lost. I would love to read the literature you could provide otherwise if you have any.
 
Fire This Is Fine GIF by MOODMAN
 
I know the origins of Antifaschisitsche Aktion, a communist organization to fight off fascisim and it couldn't be more meaningless. Look at their current actions and how many nazi's do you see them fighting in our streets?
598e6f7b9d51d.image.jpg1200px-Charlottesville_'Unite_the_Right'_Rally_(35780274914)_crop.jpg
There's two. You need more? Also, googling how to spell it in German isn't understanding why they exist and what they are about.

You call it property damage, I call it civil disobedience for a worthy cause.
No one can say what would happen if the US didnt enter WW2, we were giving aid to the allies far before we were officially in the war, so take that back and more than likely they would have lost. I would love to read the literature you could provide otherwise if you have any.
I mean literally any non US school system history book will tell you who won ww2. It was those dirty communists, and that front was won before we landed at Normandy. We fought the b team in France, because the soviets kicked the fuck out of the nazi's on the eastern front. Yes lend lease was important, but the soviets won the war for the allies, no ifs ands or buts about it.
 
There's two. You need more? Also, googling how to spell it in German isn't understanding why they exist and what they are about.

You call it property damage, I call it civil disobedience for a worthy cause.

I mean literally any non US school system history book will tell you who won ww2. It was those dirty communists, and that front was won before we landed at Normandy. We fought the b team in France, because the soviets kicked the fuck out of the nazi's on the eastern front. Yes lend lease was important, but the soviets won the war for the allies, no ifs ands or buts about it.
Civil disobedience at the cost of the all those small businesses and the US tax payer, they are said to have caused over 2 billion in damages. Damages to their city hall in seattle, their court houses, you know who pays for that? Me, you and every single tax payer. Its a bad standard to set that you can get upset about something and just start destroying shit, if the trump supporters took that route instead of praying outside polling stations or whatever dumb stuff they are doing the whole US would be in ruin.

If the right wing should start a group called "super anti nazi, anti communism fun totally not an official group" and start destroying everything in the name of a "worthy cause" like making sure an election is fair, you would be equally for it I would imagine?


I know the soviets played a vital role in the defeat of the axis in WW2, never claimed they didn't. But once again, I would love to see any sources that you have, I have yet to find any supporting your claim that without the US's help or entrance in the war the allies would have won.

As pence said during the VP debate, you are welcome to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
 
You call it property damage, I call it civil disobedience for a worthy cause.

So you wanna talk about destruction to government buildings or other places that are symbols of the systematic issues sure I get that.

Yet just because the cause is worthy doesn’t give people the right to loot and destroy as they please. Why does average joe deserve to have his business destroyed?
 
So you wanna talk about destruction to government buildings or other places that are symbols of the systematic issues sure I get that.

Yet just because the cause is worthy doesn’t give people the right to loot and destroy as they please. Why does average joe deserve to have his business destroyed?
Anyone who thinks looting and destruction is justified has some sort of mental retardation.
 
Civil disobedience at the cost of the all those small businesses and the US tax payer, they are said to have caused over 2 billion in damages. Damages to their city hall in seattle, their court houses, you know who pays for that? Me, you and every single tax payer. Its a bad standard to set that you can get upset about something and just start destroying shit, if the trump supporters took that route instead of praying outside polling stations or whatever dumb stuff they are doing the whole US would be in ruin.

If the right wing should start a group called "super anti nazi, anti communism fun totally not an official group" and start destroying everything in the name of a "worthy cause" like making sure an election is fair, you would be equally for it I would imagine?


I know the soviets played a vital role in the defeat of the axis in WW2, never claimed they didn't. But once again, I would love to see any sources that you have, I have yet to find any supporting your claim that without the US's help or entrance in the war the allies would have won.

As pence said during the VP debate, you are welcome to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
Will respond to this later to busy for an involved answer right this second.
So you wanna talk about destruction to government buildings or other places that are symbols of the systematic issues sure I get that.

Yet just because the cause is worthy doesn’t give people the right to loot and destroy as they please. Why does average joe deserve to have his business destroyed?

Anyone who thinks looting and destruction is justified has some sort of mental retardation.
Tell that to the dudes who tossed the tea in the harbor. We celebrate that revolutionary act don't we? How is fighting for the rights and lives of people less important or worthwhile than.... A tea tax?
 
Tell that to the dudes who tossed the tea in the harbor. We celebrate that revolutionary act don't we? How is fighting for the rights and lives of people less important or worthwhile than.... A tea tax?
Right, there were protesting a tea tax so they targeted the tea. Hence why I said the whole thing about targeting symbols and government buildings.

I'm not denying the importance of fighting for the rights and lives of people. Again, I'm asking why does average Joe deserve to have his livelyhood destroyed when it has zero to do with the issue at hand?
 
Tell that to the dudes who tossed the tea in the harbor. We celebrate that revolutionary act don't we? How is fighting for the rights and lives of people less important or worthwhile than.... A tea tax?

I would say there is a wholehearted difference between dumping the tea of the East India Company and burning down businesses and setting fires close to neighborhoods.

Burning the courthouse, PD precinct, Mayor's residence etc etc, hell yeah get ya flame on. The line stops at private property of those not responsible for the original harm done. Usually people respond "oh but they had insurance" that's irregardless of the matter and distracts from the initial attacks on individual and private property versus the party who caused the initial harm.

I don't punch my mom in the back of the head and say it was OK because I have daddy issues and she has health insurance.
 
Funny how people always forget the Pacific Campaign was a major part of WW2...
Oh I'm not discounting the overwhelming part the US played in the pacific. Definitely did lions share there, however the examples sharkbait used were exclusively European theater of operations.
 
Oh I'm not discounting the overwhelming part the US played in the pacific. Definitely did lions share there, however the examples sharkbait used were exclusively European theater of operations.
Sorry, partly in the conco, dealing with a passive aggressive toddler and his shit brother.
 
Civil disobedience at the cost of the all those small businesses and the US tax payer, they are said to have caused over 2 billion in damages. Damages to their city hall in seattle, their court houses, you know who pays for that? Me, you and every single tax payer. Its a bad standard to set that you can get upset about something and just start destroying shit, if the trump supporters took that route instead of praying outside polling stations or whatever dumb stuff they are doing the whole US would be in ruin.

If the right wing should start a group called "super anti nazi, anti communism fun totally not an official group" and start destroying everything in the name of a "worthy cause" like making sure an election is fair, you would be equally for it I would imagine?


I know the soviets played a vital role in the defeat of the axis in WW2, never claimed they didn't. But once again, I would love to see any sources that you have, I have yet to find any supporting your claim that without the US's help or entrance in the war the allies would have won.

As pence said during the VP debate, you are welcome to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
If we care about 2 billion in property damages, that an insurance company will most likely pay for, via the taxpayer somehow, I would imagine because of lobbying their political buddies to approve, shouldn’t we also then be concerned about those corporate bailouts and things like the mortgage crash and other economic destruction that was caused and no one was blamed for? Where is the outrage of untold billions upon billions.also 2 billion is nothing compared to the cost of stadiums built because of public money. If money wasted is your biggest argument then actually make the argument across the board regardless of politics.
 
Will respond to this later to busy for an involved answer right this second.



Tell that to the dudes who tossed the tea in the harbor. We celebrate that revolutionary act don't we? How is fighting for the rights and lives of people less important or worthwhile than.... A tea tax?
Pretty sure they dumped the tea and did not keep it for themselves to sell on marketplace and Craigslist.
 
If we care about 2 billion in property damages, that an insurance company will most likely pay for, via the taxpayer somehow, I would imagine because of lobbying their political buddies to approve, shouldn’t we also then be concerned about those corporate bailouts and things like the mortgage crash and other economic destruction that was caused and no one was blamed for? Where is the outrage of untold billions upon billions.also 2 billion is nothing compared to the cost of stadiums built because of public money. If money wasted is your biggest argument then actually make the argument across the board regardless of politics.
Because comparing a stadium which offers revenue versus the wholesale destruction of private property are two completely and unrelated things that take Ninja Warrior mental gymnastics to get through for any type of partially functional but exponentially retarded comprehension.

You know what dude, as a guy married to a black woman and a supporting ally I'm going to torch my neighbors car in retaliation of the government killing it's citizens...
 
But once again, I would love to see any sources that you have, I have yet to find any supporting your claim that without the US's help or entrance in the war the allies would have won
Stalingrad happened not long after the US was entering the war. The Russians went on the offensive then and didn’t stop til they reached Berlin. The US helped end the war sooner, but it was over in June 1941 when Barbarossa kicked off. It is true though that Russian troops rode into Berlin on US trucks (and T-34’s)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom