4th quarter 2017

[CaptainObvious]

They did not increase the natl avgerage. They FINALLY inserted accurate data. The reason the swings are massive in some areas is because the old numbers were really that far off.
The Decision Lense Criteria is probably still garbage but this will more than likely atleast remove all of those absolute frauds at the top of the Priority List from drafting first next round. Because all of those highly sought after towers are now one hundred million billion percent proj and won't be eligible to draft anyone.

I guess fuck those of us who want to get to one of those facilities in our hometown? Because I don't want to go to A80 I should get fucked?

 

[adub]

I apologize... didn't realize there were columns hidden from view... here's an updated PDF with all columns expanded out that have any kind of data.

 

[Move78]

Thank you for the update. So yeah, nationally the possible losses went from 191 in June to 194 in July so movement has not been decreased it's just been shuffled around, pretty dramatically in some cases.

I apologize... didn't realize there were columns hidden from view... here's an updated PDF with all columns expanded out that have any kind of data.

 

[breakaway2000]

I guess fuck those of us who want to get to one of those facilities in our hometown? Because I don't want to go to A80 I should get fucked?

To be fair, I think Omegahare has been railroaded by this process too. I understand the hatred for this process, but are you opposed to them using the correct data for each facility?

 

[See You Next Time]

so how do you know if you can let anyone go? I thought they used projected and current cpc numbers? Our numbers are 81.8 and projected 113.7

 

[Move78]

I guess fuck those of us who want to get to one of those facilities in our hometown? Because I don't want to go to A80 I should get fucked?

I'm not a fan of the NCEPT in any way. Personally I'd clearly be better served under the old system. I'm getting married to a controller and this process requires us to play this lotto separately with no regard to keeping us attached and forcing us to either allow this process to render us ineligible for advancement because we're married or be willing to separate indefinitely. Currently 1 of us has a TOL through NCEPT with the other in limbo for anywhere from 3 months to infinite years.
But they are legitimately trying to, and succeeding in, improving this process. You could make the argument they're just dressing up a turd and you'd be right. But they've decided to basically completely remove the human element from the priority rankings and still allow the human element in the actual selections. In the PPT we are all just a number.

 

[Move78]

It lists the number of losses on the far right column of the 3 page pdf posted by @adub. Your 81.8 will keep you from releasing anyone. Depending on your facility staffing target you will need atleast 1 checkout entered in to the SWB by the PPT cutoff in late August.

so how do you know if you can let anyone go? I thought they used projected and current cpc numbers? Our numbers are 81.8 and projected 113.7

 

[breakaway2000]

On a side note, can we all share a nice laugh at N90 needing 307 trainees just to meet the national average.

 

[Turn Right or Die]

The column AC (ERR Category) is calculating incorrectly by 3% due to the projected national avg overriding the 90% threshold specified in the ERR MOU.

 

[Move78]

The column AC (ERR Category) is calculating incorrectly by 3% due to the projected national avg overriding the 90% threshold specified in the ERR MOU.

What a huge win if they never figure out how to fix that. It should be 90 anyway.

 

[Mike Kilo]

Wonder what it means for places like MWH. Put an ERR into there and their new numbers are crazy.

You purposely put an ERR on for MWH? That's crazy talk, did you hit up all the local facilities like PSC (much better to work at) or GEG?

 

[adub]

You purposely put an ERR on for MWH? That's crazy talk, did you hit up all the local facilities like PSC (much better to work at) or GEG?

I'm looking at them, yes.. I know it's crazy talk, but if you knew my situation you'd understand. I don't know much about MWH other than its numbers are low, however, and the location.

 

[CaptainObvious]

To be fair, I think Omegahare has been railroaded by this process too. I understand the hatred for this process, but are you opposed to them using the correct data for each facility?

Not at all. It's representative. More a general anger against the arbitrary numbers

 

[rugbydog11]

It honestly shouldnt be done quarterly, or have a priority list. If the facilty needs people, they should be able to pull whenever from the submitted ERRs like the old system. Keep people from just submitting to high priority places just to get out. Then you can just have your papers to where you actually want to go, and wait it out. Longer it has been in that queue should have priority. Once you accept one, all others drop like this new system. No more than 1 year release dates.

 

[breakaway2000]

I'm looking at them, yes.. I know it's crazy talk, but if you knew my situation you'd understand. I don't know much about MWH other than its numbers are low, however, and the location.

Given the fact their 25% success rate has them needing an outrageous 25 trainees. They'll probably be ranked in the top 10.

 

[adub]

Given the fact their 25% success rate has them needing an outrageous 25 trainees. They'll probably be ranked in the top 10.

Hoping so 😉

 

[cosoccer]

I'm sure this has been answered before just can't find it anywhere in black and white. 2 controllers apply to same facility but can only release one, what are the factors that panel uses for who gets the slot? In the SOP it says ATM priority list is "only for reference", so what are the tie breakers?

 

[COWTOWN]

Can a facility be Category I, but unable to release anyone?

 

[MJ]

I'm sure this has been answered before just can't find it anywhere in black and white. 2 controllers apply to same facility but can only release one, what are the factors that panel uses for who gets the slot? In the SOP it says ATM priority list is "only for reference", so what are the tie breakers?

The ATM ranking is the tiebreaker. Oh and the panel can arbitrarily select whomever.

Can a facility be Category I, but unable to release anyone?

Previously, yes. Currently, no.

 

[BRAVOECHO]

This spreadsheet is the most mind blowing thing. lol. Anyone know the important columns to factor into future releases? My facility is green/green but still a Cat 'none'.