So suddenly my facilities training success rate jumped nearly 30%, and average training time is half of what it was.
Okay.
What facility? My guess would be your training time is lower, meaning less losses over a shorter time frame.Did they change the time frame on this? Our projected losses dropped by 3 full people with nothing actually changing.
MSY... The training time is suddenly .7 which doesnt seem right at allWhat facility? My guess would be your training time is lower, meaning less losses over a shorter time frame.
ZDV is in a similar spot as before. Just below the natl avg and is eligible to select 4-5 currently. Can't release anyone.I've refreshed the natca ncept page about 500 times waiting for a update in the last hour. How screwed is ZDV?
Clearly a huge difference maker was the updated training time in years number reducing everyone's projected retirements numbers so much.Did they change the time frame on this? Our projected losses dropped by 3 full people with nothing actually changing.
This is the reason. Projected +- are over the training period time frame; IE next 12 months, 24 months, etc...MSY... The training time is suddenly .7 which doesnt seem right at all
So even though we were 5 below last time and picked up 5, we are now still 5 below the national average. Perfect system.ZDV is in a similar spot as before. Just below the natl avg and is eligible to select 4-5 currently. Can't release anyone.
It's possible that because MSY is a 9 up/down and probably only get CPC-ITs that their avg training time is really short because recerts can be extremely fast if it's not a huge jump in difficulty from their previous facility.MSY... The training time is suddenly .7 which doesnt seem right at all
Numbers are based on your facility success rate from 2010-2014. This is the first panel they're using facility specific success rates and it will continue from here on out.So suddenly my facilities training success rate jumped nearly 30%, and average training time is half of what it was.
Okay.
Your CPC target number was agreed upon by your FacRep and ATM. They had an allowable range to choose from. If you feel it is too high/low, your FacRep in 2015 is to blame.My crystal ball says the next thing that will happen is the CPC target will be "adjusted" down in lower level facilities because they are based on old numbers.
Projected losses (specifically retirements) are calculated once per year. They now use your training success time-frames as to when projected retirements should count against you. I'm guessing each facility had their projected retirements recalculated based on their new timeframe. Mandatory retirement - Training success time = the age at which a projected retiree is counted.Did they change the time frame on this? Our projected losses dropped by 3 full people with nothing actually changing.
This PPT is basically unrelated to the June NCEPT. The new data changed everything completely.So even though we were 5 below last time and picked up 5, we are now still 5 below the national average. Perfect system.
Updated training time, which corresponds to your new projected retirement schedule. Centers will always be at a disadvantage with regards to this. Longer training time and an overall older workforce will result in large projected retirement figures.So even though we were 5 below last time and picked up 5, we are now still 5 below the national average. Perfect system.
Also like @breakaway2000 said, this is based off real data. So if you don't suck I guess you can legitimately expect to get yourself ready for certification in about 8.5 months of training at MSY.MSY... The training time is suddenly .7 which doesnt seem right at all