4th quarter 2017

[adub]

Wonder what it means for places like MWH. Put an ERR into there and their new numbers are crazy.

 

[SugarFoot1]

I'm off till tomorrow evening and would love to get this uploaded

 

[wikdevo]

anyone wanna give me the numbers for dsm?

 

[Bigfella]

Anyone got an upload?

 

[adub]

Here we go.. latest PPT posted

 

[SugarFoot1]

Here we go.. latest PPT posted

Awesome thanks

 

[corn4ahead]

The blows keep coming. Wow.

 

[ATC_av8er]

I love the numbers game that is being played. The average has now increased magically 11 percent which will allow tons of movement but we still have the same number of controllers. Sounds like people could have been on the move long ago. Infinite wisdom.

How will INCREASING the average allow for movement? If the average is lower, doesn't that mean facilities can let more people go? I'm still trying to figure out this NCEPT thing. Also, anyone have the minutes from the previous panel?

 

[wikdevo]

ok.. should i be looking at projected or current? current national average is 82.2 and we are at 86.4 so we would be able to lose 1 currently, correct ?

 

[corn4ahead]

How will INCREASING the average allow for movement? If the average is lower, doesn't that mean facilities can let more people go? I'm still trying to figure out this NCEPT thing. Also, anyone have the minutes from the previous panel?

Increasing the projected absolutely DECREASES movement. The number is artificially high. The MOU needs rewritten to account for the new numbers or there are going to be even more people stuck.

 

[Move78]

Increasing the projected absolutely DECREASES movement. The number is artificially high. The MOU needs rewritten to account for the new numbers or there are going to be even more people stuck.

The number is not artificially high. The number is now accurate and used to be artificially low. What needs to change is disconnecting the proj natl avg from the number required for release.

 

[rugbydog11]

ok.. should i be looking at projected or current? current national average is 82.2 and we are at 86.4 so we would be able to lose 1 currently, correct ?

You need to look at both. If your projected is less than the projected national avg, no releases.

 

[Move78]

How will INCREASING the average allow for movement? If the average is lower, doesn't that mean facilities can let more people go? I'm still trying to figure out this NCEPT thing. Also, anyone have the minutes from the previous panel?

They did not increase the natl avgerage. They FINALLY inserted accurate data. The reason the swings are massive in some areas is because the old numbers were really that far off.
The Decision Lense Criteria is probably still garbage but this will more than likely atleast remove all of those absolute frauds at the top of the Priority List from drafting first next round. Because all of those highly sought after towers are now one hundred million billion percent proj and won't be eligible to draft anyone.

 

[wikdevo]

we are

You need to look at both. If your projected is less than the projected national avg, no releases.

we are projected to be 106%!guess we are looking mint for the next panel.

 

[Move78]

Increasing the projected absolutely DECREASES movement. The number is artificially high. The MOU needs rewritten to account for the new numbers or there are going to be even more people stuck.

Also increasing the natl proj doesn't actually decrease movement nationally. Because it's an average. So the number of eligible losses should remain similar. That column is not displayed in that pdf though I don't think. This insertion of new data is absolutely going to rebalance everything though. So there are a lot of people out there who are at facilities with high wash rates who are getting crazy railroaded by this change. But the argument for this change is undeniable.

 

[GO]

we show a placement list inbound on the new PPT but nothing on the last terminal placement list update on 6/19, so is it safe to assume someone from the academy just got selected in the last 10 days?

 

[Andrew]

we show a placement list inbound on the new PPT but nothing on the last terminal placement list update on 6/19, so is it safe to assume someone from the academy just got selected in the last 10 days?

Probably that or hardship man.

 

[Move78]

we show a placement list inbound on the new PPT but nothing on the last terminal placement list update on 6/19, so is it safe to assume someone from the academy just got selected in the last 10 days?

There's a Terminal Placement List update from a few days ago

 

[Move78]

There's a Terminal Placement List update from a few days ago

Also, PLI's are much more likely to be representative of being on the terminal list as opposed to actually being selected. Because once you get picked that body becomes a committed inbound or actual trainee very quickly.

 

[GO]

There's a Terminal Placement List update from a few days ago

I was just going off the one updated on this site. thanks for the information