Contract Extensions - I am challenging the NATCA National Constitution

Radar Contact

Active Member
FAA
Messages
37
Facility
ZKC Kansas City Center
Hey, guys. I’m bringing this over from Reddit for more visibility. Understand that while a more direct amendment to the constitution is needed to codify membership’s basic democratic right to vote on their contract, this is still a viable and important step.

I am challenging the Constitution Committee's interpretation of Article VI, Section 2 of the NATCA National Constitution.

I have attached both the Committee's interpretation - which was in response to my inquiry - and my challenge to it.

Article VI, Section 2 states clearly that “negotiated term agreements shall be sent to the affected membership for ratification.” Despite that, the CBA was extended without a vote of the membership, continuing a long-standing practice that I believe directly contradicts the Constitution and strips members of their fundamental right to vote on their own contract.

I followed the process exactly as written in Article XIV, Section 4:

On 9/3/25 I submitted a request for interpretation of Article VI, Section 2 to the Constitution Committee. On 10/31/25 I received the Committee's response, which was unsatisfactory. On 11/28/25 I filed a challenge to the interpretation with President Nick Daniels.

To date, I have heard nothing from Nick. There have been two NEB meetings. No response. I am in the process of petitioning for relief to be heard on the floor at the NATCA Convention in Chicago in 2027.

I am done waiting. This is where you come in.

Under our Constitution, the next step is to take this issue to the floor of the 2027 National Convention, where delegates - not leadership - decide. That is my intent.

I have been a controller for 10 years and have yet to vote on my contract. That is unacceptable. If you believe that members should have the fundamental right to vote on their contract - yes, including contract extensions - I am asking you to talk to your local reps and delegates. Tell them this issue matters to you, and demand they vote to support restoring mandatory ratification at the convention in 2027.

Delegates vote how their members tell them to vote. An entire generation of controllers have been disenfranchised by their own union. If enough of you speak up, this changes.

I’ll continue pushing this forward and will keep members informed as it moves toward convention.
 

Attachments

Best of luck to you and I’ll try and help when the time comes. Last year, a group tried passing an amendment at convention That would require extensions to be ratified by membership. It was overwhelmingly shot down, and I couldn’t even convince my local to vote in favor. The biggest concern one of the delegates had was if there was a now or never offer to extend from the administrator, it would be difficult for NATCA to get everyone to vote in a short time span.
My opinion is pretty simple: contract duration is one of the most important terms, and A change in duration should be seen as a new contract. If the FAA wants to put tight timelines on extensions, then NATCA shouldn’t agree to them.
 
Best of luck to you and I’ll try and help when the time comes. Last year, a group tried passing an amendment at convention That would require extensions to be ratified by membership. It was overwhelmingly shot down, and I couldn’t even convince my local to vote in favor. The biggest concern one of the delegates had was if there was a now or never offer to extend from the administrator, it would be difficult for NATCA to get everyone to vote in a short time span.
My opinion is pretty simple: contract duration is one of the most important terms, and A change in duration should be seen as a new contract. If the FAA wants to put tight timelines on extensions, then NATCA shouldn’t agree to them.
Yep, and I completely agree. A contract extension is essentially a new contract. It is completely unacceptable that NATCA has chosen to ignore membership’s ratification rights while so many other unions explicitly guarantee them for extensions.

The argument that leadership needs the flexibility to make a decision within 24 hours is absurd. If we are given any proposal in regards to the wages, hours, or terms of employment, it has to receive a membership vote. If the agency puts an arbitrary and unreasonable expiration on the offer, then it’s a non-starter.

We elect leaders to negotiate. Membership ratifies.

Somehow countless other unions understand these basic democratic principles, while NATCA has drifted into this bizarre world of apathy and disenfranchisement.

It ends next year.
 
Yep, and I completely agree. A contract extension is essentially a new contract. It is completely unacceptable that NATCA has chosen to ignore membership’s ratification rights while so many other unions explicitly guarantee them for extensions.

The argument that leadership needs the flexibility to make a decision within 24 hours is absurd. If we are given any proposal in regards to the wages, hours, or terms of employment, it has to receive a membership vote. If the agency puts an arbitrary and unreasonable expiration on the offer, then it’s a non-starter.

We elect leaders to negotiate. Membership ratifies.

Somehow countless other unions understand these basic democratic principles, while NATCA has drifted into this bizarre world of apathy and disenfranchisement.

It ends next year.
I mean in high school we had this technology where you registered a unique number clicker and could select a, but, c, or d. Maybe we have some way to quickly notify members and vote...this was in 2001 so I'm not sure if something like that would exist yet.
 
I mean in high school we had this technology where you registered a unique number clicker and could select a, but, c, or d. Maybe we have some way to quickly notify members and vote...this was in 2001 so I'm not sure if something like that would exist yet.
There’s technology to send everyone a text in an instant. Everyone replies yes or no and the system tallies it up. As long as it’s not sent in the middle of the night for any time zone, I’m sure a 4 hour period will give everyone the opportunity to see the text and respond.
 
There’s technology to send everyone a text in an instant. Everyone replies yes or no and the system tallies it up. As long as it’s not sent in the middle of the night for any time zone, I’m sure a 4 hour period will give everyone the opportunity to see the text and respond.
The Rinaldi - Zillonis election was also done with computer ballots. I don’t know why they say that is impossible now and only use paper ballots.
 
Back
Top Bottom