AnyTrafficPleaseAdvise
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 709
True, but the conservative argument goes "if you don't like it, find another job".
True, but the conservative argument goes "if you don't like it, find another job".
That's not a gotcha - there's not really any denying that a conservative value is accountability for one's own situation- often to a fault. Finding examples of Dem's crossing over to that line doesn't change that.
Yeah buuuuut…. The Supreme Court ruled the vax mandate unconstitutional. Besides, the mandate was for all companies in the US with 100 or more employees. So looks like youre left with a minimum wage job. some choice huh?True, but the conservative argument goes "if you don't like it, find another job".
To be clear, I disagreed with the mandate for private businesses. I thought it was within his pervue to mandate it for Feds.Yeah buuuuut…. The Supreme Court ruled the vax mandate unconstitutional. Besides, the mandate was for all companies in the US with 100 or more employees. So looks like youre left with a minimum wage job. some choice huh?
Turns out it wasn’t in his pervueTo be clear, I disagreed with the mandate for private businesses. I thought it was within his pervue to mandate it for Feds.
But the mandate for businesses did include a test-out option. So that doesn't leave just minimum wage jobs.
End of day, "my body my choice" peeps are hypocritical, "don't like it, find another job" people are hypocritical.
Which pretty much accounts for everybody except those damn moderates.
That was never determined.Turns out it wasn’t in his pervue
This is something that wasn't ruled on.This supreme court ruled against things from the past I'm shocked
Not really shocked. Don’t really care either. Personally I’d find a new job before I ever got any of that garbage.That was never determined.
This is something that wasn't ruled on.
After the main mandate was ruled on, Biden withdrew the federal one.
SCOTUS hence didn't rule on it, instead it vacated the case, calling it "moot".
Shocked now?
Still waiting for my heart attack or whateverNot really shocked. Don’t really care either. Personally I’d find a new job before I ever got any of that garbage.
That sucks. Im sorryStill waiting for my heart attack or whatever
... was more asking AB if they were shocked, since they said they were shocked that SCOTUS ruled on something in the past, when in fact it wasn't ruled on.Not really shocked. Don’t really care either. Personally I’d find a new job before I ever got any of that garbage.
we sure as fuck won’t get hazard paySafe and effective. But you can’t sue the government nor the manufacturers if you’re injured. Two weeks to slow the spread. You’re body my choice, vaccinate or terminate. lol on the positive side maybe will get that sweet Covid schedule again
Was natca not fighting for hazard pay right?Lmao we’re not going to debate vaccine mandate again. We all know who was right let us move on.
I like the big hazard pay conundrum. One side won’t take the shot or wear a mask but demands hazard pay. One side won’t pay hazard pay but demands the shot and the mask. It’s a real egg chickenWas natca not fighting for hazard pay right?
What about the side that willingly got the shot and demanded hazard pay?I like the big hazard pay conundrum. One side won’t take the shot or wear a mask but demands hazard pay. One side won’t pay hazard pay but demands the shot and the mask. It’s a real egg chicken
They are the righteousWhat about the side that willingly got the shot and demanded hazard pay?
Fuck that guyThe smart people left NATCA that first year after the vaccine mandate when they didn’t do dick, and/or had cock suckers like Jim Marinetti promoting the vaccine.
That was the canary in the coal mine moment where it was clear NATCA was eternal trash, I admit I didn’t realize it at the time.
Why fight for hazard pay when you can fight for the jab, hazard solved. Safe and protected nowwe sure as fuck won’t get hazard pay
Was natca not fighting for hazard pay right?