This comment isn't directed at you. It's for educational purposes for all. An alternative pay plan that is not funded by Congress is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Having been a member here seemingly forever, it's not surprising how few of you have a clue about the differences with authorization and appropriation and their connection to the intricacies of Congressionally-approved pay raises and President-selected alternative pay plans.
Let there be no mistake... throwing all feds a bone (as it relates to pay) on the way out the door would be a terrible idea. What do I mean? Let me use last FY as an example. Biden authorized an alternative pay plan of 4.7% plus 0.5% for locality in August 2023 to begin in January 2024. What happened? We did get that money; however, Congress did not appropriate funds to cover this amount, which left it on the Agencies to fund out of other budget lines. For the FAA, replacement of equipment reaching obsolescence (at or near the end of its lifecycle) was delayed or cancelled, purchase of spare parts was delayed or not purchased, repairs of non-critical systems were delayed or cancelled, facility maintenance was pushed-back until it could not be pushed-back any further, and on and on and on.