Training hold

Status
Not open for further replies.
The reason why it seems that was is probably because everyone had turned in their leave. At least that’s how it is where I am
He’s probably talking about reduced staffing actually on shift. Not reduced staffing numbers at the facility.
 
He’s probably talking about reduced staffing actually on shift. Not reduced staffing numbers at the facility.
Ohhh. We’re at mins basically but if ppl started taking leave we literally couldn’t operate and would have to go back to 5/2
 
“Not interested in reduction in force” and “reduction in force has been discussed and is a possibility” are not mutually exclusive.

Doesn’t mean anyone’s lying. Could be an exaggeration or misunderstanding in terms of the scope of these “discussions.” And it’s possible that a meteor wipes us out next year. Sounds like both sides using language that will be technically correct either way because it doesn’t mean anything.
 
The NWP RVP 100% said on a call that RIF is in play, and that was a big part of his justification for why certain facilities are being forced back to BWS, during a huge spike in not only cases nationwide, but in ATC-0 events across the country. He mentioned "getting ahead of the Furloughs" by bringing everybody back into the building to train. I have no reason to just make that up.

My personal opinion is that they're making RIF threats up to use as an excuse for why we're going back to BWS and adding bodies to the facility, when we are at a higher level of COVID spread than we were during 5/10. I dont think anybody is actually buying it, but its what they're trying to sell.
 
The NWP RVP 100% said on a call that RIF is in play, and that was a big part of his justification for why certain facilities are being forced back to BWS, during a huge spike in not only cases nationwide, but in ATC-0 events across the country. He mentioned "getting ahead of the Furloughs" by bringing everybody back into the building to train. I have no reason to just make that up.

My personal opinion is that they're making RIF threats up to use as an excuse for why we're going back to BWS and adding bodies to the facility, when we are at a higher level of COVID spread than we were during 5/10. I dont think anybody is actually buying it, but its what they're trying to sell.
How they bringing people back with the Harvard map?
 
I have wondered myself if the FAA will realize how inflated some of the staffing numbers are though since we're running nearly 100% traffic with reduced staffing and getting 3hrs+ training per trainee done a day.
We are not living in the same world. I train approximately three days a month and at maybe 60% of last years traffic
 
“Not interested in reduction in force” and “reduction in force has been discussed and is a possibility” are not mutually exclusive.

Doesn’t mean anyone’s lying. Could be an exaggeration or misunderstanding in terms of the scope of these “discussions.” And it’s possible that a meteor wipes us out next year. Sounds like both sides using language that will be technically correct either way because it doesn’t mean anything.
I think the fact that we already had an ATC shortage pre-COVID plus the two vaccines plus retirements/attrition just doesn’t add up to an RIF. Straight from the email the same sentiment was echoed as well. I’m a hard SELL on the RIF at least for controllers. Maybe support specialists maybe training specialists whatever but they aren’t going to kill the goose that lays the golden egg
 
Waivers can be applied for to bring people in before the map says it’s okay. And I would imagine upper management won’t mind approving them.
Really? We got some CPC ITs that were already certified here that can’t get approved. They’d be CPC again in under a month
 
RIF would be phased in through attrition and a hiring freeze. Stop freaking people out.
So based off this comment and what my RVP said, RIF is happening immediately, anyone within 5 years of retirement is getting axed and anyone in the academy or lined up to go to the academy is also axed. Trust me my RVP said
 
I was told by my facrep waivers would be submitted and considered. Haven’t heard of any actually being approved. Probably not realistic for most on EA with how cases are only getting worse
 
So based off this comment and what my RVP said, RIF is happening immediately, anyone within 5 years of retirement is getting axed and anyone in the academy or lined up to go to the academy is also axed. Trust me my RVP said
Assuming no hiring freeze this backlog is gonna be epic for the AGs. Behind my group that luckily got recalled in June and are training now. It’s gonna be like about 2 years for the next person to certify. And there’s about 30 people in that group
 
How they bringing people back with the Harvard map?
Anybody that has sectors/Dsides is going to be brought back for their 120 day currency, and they're going to remain on the schedule after that. All to protect from RIF discussions that NATCA National say arent actually happening.

No idea about AG people.
 
Anybody that has sectors/Dsides is going to be brought back for their 120 day currency, and they're going to remain on the schedule after that. All to protect from RIF discussions that NATCA National say arent actually happening.

No idea about AG people.
Oh word. I thought everyone that had sectors was already back.
 
Oh word. I thought everyone that had sectors was already back.

Not Here. I have all of my D sides and was about to go to radar class in March when we were sent home. we just got our waiver approved a couple weeks ago to bring back fully D-side certified developmentals. Yesterday was my first day back. we didnt have anyone with partial radar quals though.
 
Not Here. I have all of my D sides and was about to go to radar class in March when we were sent home. we just got our waiver approved a couple weeks ago to bring back fully D-side certified developmentals. Yesterday was my first day back. we didnt have anyone with partial radar quals though.
Do you know if they just approved a waiver to have trainees brought back or everyone on EA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom