File a grievance vs who through? It would have to be vs. NATCA since they agreed to this. I doubt the grievance would get advanced. Filing vs incompetents in HR (not that they had the power to do this one their own either) who deserve it are out of the jurisdiction of our grievance process.You guys at facilities who can release people who aren't getting picked up at places that can take people but aren't need to start filing grievances
You all think this was a trial and error as this is a special panel due to the government shutdown or it is going to be here to stay? So in addition to your facility having enough staffing and the facility you want has openings, your facility has to be more healthy than the facility you want’s staffing (at least for round 2, who knows about round 1)
We will be meeting with the agency to create a formula that takes both sides concerns into effect and moves forward with a lot more transparency, so our members will have a better idea of which facilities will be gaining and losing controllers. Our intent is to have the new formula up and running by the next panel. The next panel’s date will be decided at the next meeting.
Total ERRs considered: 4411
Total ERRs ranked: 1190
From 421 employees
Total Selections: 121
Approved Mutual Reassignments: 0
Enroute: 24
Terminal: 97
Category 1: 31
Category 2: 90
Losing facilities: 89
Gaining facilities: 53
Here to stay. This was the rest of the email
Here to stay. This was the rest of the email
You’re wrong, it’s the textbook definition of collaboration.This is not "collaboration"
col·lab·o·ra·tion
noun
- the action of working with someone to produce or create something.
- traitorous cooperation with an enemy.
Burn it like you can't find the spider you tried to kill. Beat it like a $5 hooker and leg drop it like you're Hulk Hogan in WrestleManiaSoooo...we're burning it down right?
where one person can move 4 times before another is ever even considered to move once... amount of transfers is a garbage metric to use to try and define success.are there statistics about how many people got selected before NCEPT under the old system, VS. the new NCEPT process?
I feel like more people are changing facilities than ever before in a large part due to the new NCEPT process. It puts hard dates on when selections happen and keeps the system moving. but this is my personal feeling, I have no way of backing this up.
162 selected in Aug 2019
147 selected in Nov 2019
just over 4000 ERRs no way to know how many facilities any individual put in for.
This is a clear argument in favor of NCEPT that the union leadership and agency will both use and have used. Movement skyrocketed under NCEPT. And 5 year release dates have been eliminated. But don't @ me bros, I get it there are serious drawbacks.are there statistics about how many people got selected before NCEPT under the old system, VS. the new NCEPT process?
I feel like more people are changing facilities than ever before in a large part due to the new NCEPT process. It puts hard dates on when selections happen and keeps the system moving. but this is my personal feeling, I have no way of backing this up.
162 selected in Aug 2019
147 selected in Nov 2019
just over 4000 ERRs no way to know how many facilities any individual put in for.
I agree, they throw in your face the amount of transfers and use that as a win, but alone it says nothing. But the training success rate for transfers has been about 60-65% only. It’s like saying a QB threw 50 passes and saying nothing else about the game. Did he throw for 450 yards and 5 TD or was he throwing all game because the team was getting blown out all game? People who turn offers down they also include in that number.where one person can move 4 times before another is ever even considered to move once... amount of transfers is a garbage metric to use to try and define success.