Exactly. I don't take exception with EVs. I take exception with
32andBelow first instinct being to use the government to force free citizens and businesses to conform to whatever his agenda aligns with because he believes he has taken a morally superior position and anyone who argues for the other side is wrong. But not to worry, he has assured me he is not a fascist.
For the record, I think EVs have a place in the market but the government shouldn't be taking my tax dollars and subsidizing people to buy them in order to make them economically viable. There are enough elon fanboys in existence that there would still be demand for them without the incentives but the government has distorted the free market by artificially increasing demand. Business men pursuing their own self interest can make the decision to install superchargers at their place of business if they want. If walmart wants to install a supercharger in hopes that you'll come shop while you're charging, they can do the cost benefit analysis to determine if it's worth their investment to build them and if you build it, they will come.
It's also disingenuous to pretend that EVS are environmentally friendly while discounting the environmental impacts of lithium and cobalt mining. Or ignoring that you're charging up on a grid supplied by a coal power plant. With all that said, I think my next vehicle will be electric but won't be until advancements are made. The idea getting more miles per dollar is appealing, especially since I see the price of oil only going up in the future. I also like the idea of less regular maintenance like oil changes and less moving parts that can break that can be found in a traditional powertrains.