FEHB Premiums Increase 13.5%

[blarg]

I like how they always break out the personal attacks when you challenge their gas-lighting. But we’re supposedly the fascists.

What gaslighting? Jesus you're an idiot.

The party of tolerance and acceptance is anything but tolerant and accepting.

I'm not in a party, I'm against someone who will actively make our jobs worse, oh yea, and undermine democracy while he's at it. Tough choice.
I'd also have no problem calling you a fucking idiot to your face either.

You guys do realize that the only people in his own party that actually support him are people who are still actively trying to be in politics or profit in some way, and know they have to pander to you brainwashed dopes or risk losing re-election/Trump's wrath.
His own party hates him, they just can't say it until they decide to retire or at least not run again. Feel free to look up the massive and growing list of Republicans, including a lot of his own previous administration, that admit he should never be president again.

 

[DOD4Life]

You guys do realize that the only people in his own party that actually support him are people who are still actively trying to be in politics or profit in some way, and know they have to pander to you brainwashed dopes or risk losing re-election/Trump's wrath.
His own party hates him, they just can't say it until they decide to retire or at least not run again. Feel free to look up the massive and growing list of Republicans, including a lot of his own previous administration, that admit he should never be president again.

My thing is this: look the people who served in major positions in his first administration (VP Pence, 2 SecDefs…both Mattis and Esper, Sec of State, Chief of Staff, etc. who have publicly come out against him). They are the people who saw him up close and personal. They ALL say he is unfit. So, could it be that each one of them is wrong, or could it be the common denominator: he is uniquely unfit?

 

[AnyTrafficPleaseAdvise]

You’re all retarded.

 

[SquawkHijack]

You guys are like how can you not accept my beliefs of controlling people

Who tf are we trying to control? We’re about having peoples rights, liberties and freedoms protected, not eroded by communism.

You guys do realize that the only people in his own party that actually support him are people who are still actively trying to be in politics or profit in some way, and know they have to pander to you brainwashed dopes or risk losing re-election/Trump's wrath.
His own party hates him, they just can't say it until they decide to retire or at least not run again. Feel free to look up the massive and growing list of Republicans, including a lot of his own previous administration, that admit he should never be president again.

Seems like an awful lot of baseless claims, we were discussing benefits and the economical well being (or lack of) of our country. You’re just vomiting bullshit you saw on the news all over the room.

 

[PooseMaGoose]

I'd also have no problem calling you a fucking idiot to your face either.

lol doubtful. The loudest one in the room is usually the weakest one. You’re bold behind your keyboard.

 

[DOD4Life]

Who tf are we trying to control? We’re about having peoples rights, liberties and freedoms protected, not eroded by communism.

Are women’s rights protected now with Donald Trump bragging about killing Roe v Wade?

 

[32andBelow]

Who tf are we trying to control? We’re about having peoples rights, liberties and freedoms protected, not eroded by communism.

Bruh trump said it’s fine if states want to monitor girls periods.

 

[SquawkHijack]

Bruh trump said it’s fine if states want to monitor girls periods.

Again, more baseless claims… frankly I’m sick and tired of your bullshit rhetoric. “I think they might do that. Again, you'll have to speak to the individual states. Look, Roe v. Wade was all about bringing it back to the states.”

That is verbatim what Trump told time magazine when asked if he thinks states SHOULD monitor women’s pregnancies to track abortions. He never said he thinks it’s fine if states do that. If I’m being honest you're a lying piece of shit for wanting to twist that and put words in someone’s mouth. And to cite my quote of what Trump said, plus a fact check of Trump explicitly saying what you claimed being false:

Trump says states might monitor pregnancies to track abortions

When asked by TIME Magazine if states should monitor women's pregnancies to track abortions, former President Donald Trump said: "I think they might do that. Again, you'll have to speak to the individual states. Look, Roe v. Wade was all about bringing it back to the states." Molly Ball and...

www.cbsnews.com

False claim Trump said he'd force government monitoring on pregnant women | Fact check

Trump said abortion is a states' rights issue and that he would let states determine whether they wanted to monitor women's pregnancies.

www.usatoday.com

Are women’s rights protected now with Donald Trump bragging about killing Roe v Wade?

Umm yeah, there are still plenty of states where you can get an abortion bro. You act like abortions are illegal nation wide now. Again, he overturned it because for years everyone on both sides said it should rest with the states because there are different perspectives and necessities for it in different parts of the U.S.

 

[32andBelow]

Again, more baseless claims… frankly I’m sick and tired of your bullshit rhetoric. “I think they might do that. Again, you'll have to speak to the individual states. Look, Roe v. Wade was all about bringing it back to the states.”

That is verbatim what Trump told time magazine when asked if he thinks states SHOULD monitor women’s pregnancies to track abortions. He never said he thinks it’s fine if states do that. If I’m being honest you're a lying piece of shit for wanting to twist that and put words in someone’s mouth. And to cite my quote of what Trump said, plus a fact check of Trump explicitly saying what you claimed being false:

Trump says states might monitor pregnancies to track abortions

When asked by TIME Magazine if states should monitor women's pregnancies to track abortions, former President Donald Trump said: "I think they might do that. Again, you'll have to speak to the individual states. Look, Roe v. Wade was all about bringing it back to the states." Molly Ball and...

www.cbsnews.com

False claim Trump said he'd force government monitoring on pregnant women | Fact check

Trump said abortion is a states' rights issue and that he would let states determine whether they wanted to monitor women's pregnancies.

www.usatoday.com

You’re trying to own me on the semantics of states monitoring women?

 

[AB19]

Umm yeah, there are still plenty of states where you can get an abortion bro. You act like abortions are illegal nation wide now. Again, he overturned it because for years everyone on both sides said it should rest with the states because there are different perspectives and necessities for it in different parts of the U.S.

No one except for people on the right said it should be up to the states. States shouldn't have the ability to decide on these things. You can't have something be murder in one state and not another. Should states also vote on gay marriage? Slavery? I guess states should be allowed to vote on jim crow laws again, states rights and all that.

 

[SquawkHijack]

You’re trying to own me on the semantics of states monitoring women?

I just quoted and cited that you’re factually incorrect dipshit click the links. What you’re claiming is a testimemt to the absolute garbage you read.

And quit trying to cop out of what you said. You SAID Trump stated he was okay with states doing that. And that’s false.

No one except for people on the right said it should be up to the states. States shouldn't have the ability to decide on these things. You can't have something be murder in one state and not another. Should states also vote on gay marriage? Slavery? I guess states should be allowed to vote on jim crow laws again, states rights and all that.

Why shouldn’t states have the ability to decide? It was wanted by both sides for some time because of different necessities for reproductive rights in different states. Trump even stated that in the debate against Kamala because that was his basis behind doing it. And states vote on things all the time, why you’re bringing up slavery is kinda wack because everyone agrees that shits wrong and has been gone for a long time. Same with Jim Crow laws. All you’re bitching about is that states have the ability to decide on this particular issue which didn’t really change anything. If you want an abortion there are still plenty of places to get one.

 

[AB19]

Why shouldn’t states have the ability to decide? It was wanted by both sides for some time because of different necessities for reproductive rights in different states. Trump even stated that in the debate against Kamala because that was his basis behind doing it. And states vote on things all the time, why you’re bringing up slavery is kinda wack because everyone agrees that shits wrong and has been gone for a long time. Same with Jim Crow laws. All you’re bitching about is that states have the ability to decide on this particular issue which didn’t really change anything. If you want an abortion there are still plenty of places to get one.

Both sides didn't want it, you can keep saying it but it doesn't make it true. I see you didn't address the gay marriage thing. You only address the thing that you think is wildly dumb, because allowing states to decide abortion is just as dumb. It's the same thing as saying might as well let people own their own nukes because the second amendment should not be infringed. Drawing things to extremes shows you how stupid your views are.

 

[32andBelow]

I just quoted and cited that you’re factually incorrect dipshit click the links. What you’re claiming is a testimemt to the absolute garbage you read.

And quit trying to cop out of what you said. You SAID Trump stated he was okay with states doing that. And that’s false.

Monitoring who’s pregnant and who’s not is monitoring women’s cycle. It’s totally insane

 

[SquawkHijack]

Both sides didn't want it, you can keep saying it but it doesn't make it true. I see you didn't address the gay marriage thing. You only address the thing that you think is wildly dumb, because allowing states to decide abortion is just as dumb. It's the same thing as saying might as well let people own their own nukes because the second amendment should not be infringed. Drawing things to extremes shows you how stupid your views are.

When did I say that anything is wildly dumb? And I didn’t just say both sides wanted it, Trump did and that hasn’t been fact checked otherwise. And I didn’t address gay marriage because I don’t care enough about it to address it either way.

Monitoring who’s pregnant and who’s not is monitoring women’s cycle. It’s totally insane

Agreed. And so are you for telling yourself that Trump said he’s fine with that.

 

[Spoony90]

it’s hard to vote for the person that wants a gun ban/confiscation

 

[PooseMaGoose]

it’s hard to vote for the person that wants a gun ban/confiscation

Or somebody that willingly wipes her ass with the 4th amendment..

"JUST BECAUSE YOU LEGALLY POSSESS A GUN IN THE SANCTITY OF YOUR LOCKED HOME DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO WALK INTO THAT HOME AND CHECK TO SEE IF YOU'RE BEING RESPONSIBLE."
-Kamala Harris

 

[Spoony90]

Or somebody that willingly wipes her ass with the 4th amendment..

"JUST BECAUSE YOU LEGALLY POSSESS A GUN IN THE SANCTITY OF YOUR LOCKED HOME DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO WALK INTO THAT HOME AND CHECK TO SEE IF YOU'RE BEING RESPONSIBLE."
-Kamala Harris

Yeah all that shit is wild to me. I’m not defending Trump but I have no idea how people can defend her

 

[PooseMaGoose]

Yeah all that shit is wild to me. I’m not defending Trump but I have no idea how people can defend her

Totally respectable viewpoint. Her statement can only be one of two things.. she is ignorant of the 4A, or she knows about it but doesn’t care. Both are bad.

 

[SquawkHijack]

Or somebody that willingly wipes her ass with the 4th amendment..

"JUST BECAUSE YOU LEGALLY POSSESS A GUN IN THE SANCTITY OF YOUR LOCKED HOME DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO WALK INTO THAT HOME AND CHECK TO SEE IF YOU'RE BEING RESPONSIBLE."
-Kamala Harris

Damn yeah that’s honestly wild considering Harris talks about “the rule of law” so much.

 

[Logical_Mongoose]

You’re all retarded.