32andBelow said:I think Paul is still trying to do it. He’ll be the leader but he’ll need minions.
Think? He literally was with faa coo on linkedin at an event discussing it this year
Anyway they definitely aren't gonna drag this out and fire a bunch of feds
Phillytroll69 said:Anyway they definitely aren't gonna drag this out and fire a bunch of feds
They were gonna fire people anyways. They have been all year.
32andBelow said:I think Paul is still trying to do it. He’ll be the leader but he’ll need minions.
Oh 100% Paul is still positioning himself to lead the new ATC system. In the meantime he has a cushy lobbying gig for A4A
Gauff said:Oh 100% Paul is still positioning himself to lead the new ATC system. In the meantime he has a cushy lobbying gig for A4A
Our only hope is that we’ll get some sick A scale to get everyone on board and then all the controllers after us will get rug pulled
32andBelow said:Our only hope is that we’ll get some sick A scale to get everyone on board and then all the controllers after us will get rug pulled
Worked for the 2012 generation
32andBelow said:Our only hope is that we’ll get some sick A scale to get everyone on board and then all the controllers after us will get rug pulled
Which we should oppose as a union...
Gauff said:Which we should oppose as a union...
We should also oppose forced Co-location but here we are /shrug
Gauff said:Which we should oppose as a union...
Well you don’t know your on an A scale till the B scale comes out.
32andBelow said:Well you don’t know your on an A scale till the B scale comes out.
You know how your parents told you not to do certain things... and maybe you didn't even have an interest in doing them, but your parents just kept saying over and over not to do it, and you decided to do it not because you really wanted to, but out of spite.
These NATCA emails lately.
Radar Contact said:
Wow that oNe 90 is staffed
Somenewguy said:Anyone who says "they can't do..."
What they mean is "they can't legally do..."
This administration's defining feature is they do blatantly illegal things and wait for those illegal acts to be challenged. And we are running out of people in the legislative branch who will challenge the executive. Good luck to all federal employees right now.
So when someone says: "they can't RIF us", what they mean is: "they can't legally RIF us". In this climate that means you're probably about to get illegally RIFed and have to try to sue for damages with a very far right wing supreme court deciding what is legal.
Same as it ever was
KP-ATC said:Same as it ever was
Somenewguy said:Anyone who says "they can't do..."
What they mean is "they can't legally do..."
This administration's defining feature is they do blatantly illegal things and wait for those illegal acts to be challenged. And we are running out of people in the legislative branch who will challenge the executive. Good luck to all federal employees right now.
So when someone says: "they can't RIF us", what they mean is: "they can't legally RIF us". In this climate that means you're probably about to get illegally RIFed and have to try to sue for damages with a very far right wing supreme court deciding what is legal.
They can't fire all of us
Wat
If the government reopens then the AZ Dem Congress lady gets sworn in and then they vote to release the Epstein files. We ain’t opening any time soon is my guess.
DankVectorz said:If the government reopens then the AZ Dem Congress lady gets sworn in and then they vote to release the Epstein files. We ain’t opening any time soon is my guess.
DankVectorz said:If the government reopens then the AZ Dem Congress lady gets sworn in and then they vote to release the Epstein files. We ain’t opening any time soon is my guess.
I think it’s if the house conducts normal business they have to swear her in. So they are just keeping the whole thing closed.
32andBelow said:I think it’s if the house conducts normal business they have to swear her in. So they are just keeping the whole thing closed.
I dont blame them, if I was trying to protect pedophiles I would do the same thing. Who minds if the whole country suffers?
Somenewguy said:I dont blame them, if I was trying to protect pedophiles I would do the same thing. Who minds if the whole country suffers?
Protecting pedos and screwing millions out of health insurance...win win am I right?
Think about the rich, how are they supposed to get richer?
Archived from pointSixtyFive. The thread is closed to new posts.