Shoot The Breeze 3.0

Status
Not open for further replies.
And steal money out of the pockets of those who do not wish to be apart of that Union. PRO Act is fucking bullshit

You misspelled "force nonunion scabs to contribute to the organization which collectively bargains on their behalf."

...although that argument seems a little specious now I guess, what with the extension.
 
For being some champion of logic and debate you sure love misrepresenting data to make your point.

My point is that “get vaccinated because you’ll stay out of the hospital” is pretty much debunked when there’s a 50/50 ratio of vaccinated/unvaccinated people in the hospital. I posted multiple sources to support that. I don’t see how that’s misrepresenting data?

At best, it shows that that taking point is unreliable/not guaranteed and should be avoided, even if it isn’t a proven fact.
 
My point is that “get vaccinated because you’ll stay out of the hospital” is pretty much debunked when there’s a 50/50 ratio of vaccinated/unvaccinated people in the hospital. I posted multiple sources to support that. I don’t see how that’s misrepresenting data?

At best, it shows that that taking point is unreliable/not guaranteed and should be avoided, even if it isn’t a proven fact.
There’s not a 50/50 ratio. You live in a fantasy world

 
My point is that “get vaccinated because you’ll stay out of the hospital” is pretty much debunked when there’s a 50/50 ratio of vaccinated/unvaccinated people in the hospital. I posted multiple sources to support that. I don’t see how that’s misrepresenting data?

At best, it shows that that taking point is unreliable/not guaranteed and should be avoided, even if it isn’t a proven fact.

Take your pick. Just a cursory search of articles that have come out in the past week.
 
My point is that “get vaccinated because you’ll stay out of the hospital” is pretty much debunked when there’s a 50/50 ratio of vaccinated/unvaccinated people in the hospital. I posted multiple sources to support that. I don’t see how that’s misrepresenting data?

At best, it shows that that taking point is unreliable/not guaranteed and should be avoided, even if it isn’t a proven fact.

That’s not how math works. Here look at this: 7B7D4337-C73C-45A8-ABF3-E91A4C95B3B5.jpeg
 
Two important takes from those link dumps:

From the Fox News link 32 posted:

“Between Jan. 1 and Aug. 30, about 99 percent of hospital admissions were among those who hadn’t been fully inoculated, which is defined by the CDC as two weeks after the second dose of a Pfizer or Moderna vaccine or two weeks after Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose jab.”

Why is pre-delta variant data from January 1st being used to make a point now, in September? If it’s important that the delta variant is so different in lots of other things like vaccine spread, vulnerability to infection, etc, it doesn’t make logical sense to skew the data by mixing both together when it comes to hospitalizations, unless you’re trying to score political points.

I like the KFF link marshall posted, but it also used a January 1st start date. It also noted something important:

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently monitorshospitalizations and deaths, from any cause, among fully vaccinated individuals with COVID-19, but not breakthrough infections, which it stopped monitoring as of May 1. CDC presents this data in aggregate at the national level but not by state, and there is no single, public repository for data by state or data on breakthrough infections, since the CDC stopped monitoring them.”

The CDC stopping their monitoring of breakthrough infections is questionable at best, negligent at worst, especially with the topic we’re currently talking about.

Meanwhile, I posted data about hospitalizations that started being counted as early as June, when the delta variant hit most of the world. It paints a better picture of what’s going on right now, not skewing the data based on what happened in January.

Your links just reinforce my point that i think 4 months from now, when the data used is primarily from the delta variant and not pre-delta, the CDC will quietly revise these claims and say that the jab didn’t affect hospitalizations against the delta variant at all.
 
Two important takes from those link dumps:

From the Fox News link 32 posted:

“Between Jan. 1 and Aug. 30, about 99 percent of hospital admissions were among those who hadn’t been fully inoculated, which is defined by the CDC as two weeks after the second dose of a Pfizer or Moderna vaccine or two weeks after Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose jab.”

Why is pre-delta variant data from January 1st being used to make a point now, in September? If it’s important that the delta variant is so different in lots of other things like vaccine spread, vulnerability to infection, etc, it doesn’t make logical sense to skew the data by mixing both together when it comes to hospitalizations, unless you’re trying to score political points.

I like the KFF link marshall posted, but it also used a January 1st start date. It also noted something important:

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently monitorshospitalizations and deaths, from any cause, among fully vaccinated individuals with COVID-19, but not breakthrough infections, which it stopped monitoring as of May 1. CDC presents this data in aggregate at the national level but not by state, and there is no single, public repository for data by state or data on breakthrough infections, since the CDC stopped monitoring them.”

The CDC stopping their monitoring of breakthrough infections is questionable at best, negligent at worst, especially with the topic we’re currently talking about.

Meanwhile, I posted data about hospitalizations that started being counted as early as June, when the delta variant hit most of the world. It paints a better picture of what’s going on right now, not skewing the data based on what happened in January.

Your links just reinforce my point that i think 4 months from now, when the data used is primarily from the delta variant and not pre-delta, the CDC will quietly revise these claims and say that the jab didn’t affect hospitalizations against the delta variant at all.
I guess you’re smarter than all the doctors and scientists
.
 


Keep digging
It’s pretty disingenuous to compare hospital data from a country with universal healthcare and ours don’t you think? And reference that Massachusetts cluster, you’re conveniently leaving out the stat that really matters. Here ya go:
IMG_9183.jpg
 
Holy shit this actually makes so much sense
It’s skewed a little since it assumes no one has natural immunity but it’s going to happen as the amount of people with no immunity decreases the share of people with prior immunity in hospitals will go up not down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom