Was that the goal of that elderly lady, too? Where is your proof?
Again, you’re painting everyone that entered the Capitol with the same brush. An elderly lady with an American flag isn’t a masked person with flex cuffs.
Yes I am. My proof is she was there. Have you been part of a large crowd? There's an energy. There's talk between participants, in this case there was speeches inciting what happened. You have to do a lot of willful ignoring of facts to come to the conclusion that the little old lady didn't know what was going on. Either that or assume she's senile and got lost on the way to the retirement home cafeteria and someone handed her a flag.
Nuance of theme is clearly lost on you.
, or where all the people who do thay business are at the time,
It’s okay to destroy things if people aren’t present. Got it. Yikes.
Way to take what I said way out of context. People there doing business at the time, meaning the lawmakers present conducting business being threatened. Not that ya it's okay to do things when people aren't present. But cool play semantics games. Score one for you!
Senators were being threatened into changing how they do the job they were democratically elected to do by the anti-Kavanaugh protesters who stormed their offices and shouted down those who disagreed with their stances, were they not?
I don't think the ladies in the pussy hats where making bodily threats, had pipe bombs, literally rioted etc. They staged a sit in. Again, if you can't see the difference between that and attempting to violently subvert the constitution I can't help that.
Calling someone a traitor is the first step to thinking they need to be removed from a group. Again, fascism.
No, calling someone a traitor for no cause would be, but again, attempted violent subversion of government is Almost literally the definition of the word. Yes, I'm the one lacking nuance here for sure.
Oh cute, we’re onto demonizing and name calling of people who disagree with you.
Nope, just calling it like I see it. If you want to subvert our democratic institutions because you don't like the results of an election, if you walk hand in hand with seditionists, if you participate in a coup on behalf of a two bit grifter narcissist and are too dumb to see past the cult of personality and see it for what it is, yes you are the worst of this society and a bottom feeder, and a t a minimum need your head checked and someone to explain reality to you.
It’s really you who are, honestly.
What does this even mean?
Well, at least you’re willing to admit an elderly lady with an American flag deserves the same punishment for trespassing as a masked person with a pipe bomb does for clear terrorism. Not everyone is so bold to admit that.
"no your honor, I didn't participate in the armed robbery, though I showed up with the robbers, planned to be there beforehand, and also yelled at the bank patrons to get on the ground. But I didn't wave a gun around, so I'm innocent of any and all wrongdoing"
I feel the same way about people like you.
Yes I'm wrong for wanting to uphold our national institutions. Waving a flag around means jack shit if you don't support what that flag stands for.