Shoot The Breeze

[32andBelow]

Couple hours? You waiting for Maxine to give her opinion?

I just gave you my take. I said I’ll give the take on the next police shooting when it happens a couple hours from now

 

[Billybob]

I just watched it. Looked like the person was in danger that chick was wielding a knife at another chick. I think we want the cops to only take the action when someone is in big danger. Which it looked like she was.

idk about shooting at two people tho. That’s a bit sketchy. I say innocent. I’ll let you know about the next one in a couple hours.

some reports are saying the one with the knife was the one that called police and she was defending herself, but the bodycam is all they've put out. sad either way

Well the cops were there and she was trying to stab someone in front of the cops. Sad yes, but looked like the cop didn’t really have a choice.

What I saw was somebody with a knife about to stab somebody else with a knife and the cop shot her to prevent that from happening. Whether or not she was the one calling the cops is irrelevant

 

[SmoothBrainer]

What I saw was somebody with a knife about to stab somebody else with a knife and the cop shot her to prevent that from happening. Whether or not she was the one calling the cops is irrelevant

was just sharing more info, not saying you are wrong at all

 

[32andBelow]

What I saw was somebody with a knife about to stab somebody else with a knife and the cop shot her to prevent that from happening. Whether or not she was the one calling the cops is irrelevant

Idk why your yelling at me. I said the shot looked legit

 

[SharkBait]

Lol maybe he was convicted cus he was on camera murdering. The jury wasn’t supposed to be watching tv anyways.

I spoke nothing of the truth fullness of his conviction, but of jury tampering

 

[32andBelow]

I spoke nothing of the truth fullness of his conviction, but of jury tampering

There is no evidence of jury tampering. Did chauvins lawyer submit a motion that he believes there is jury tampering? People giving their opinion to the media isn’t jury tampering.

 

[StealthChain]

There is no evidence of jury tampering. Did chauvins lawyer submit a motion that he believes there is jury tampering? People giving their opinion to the media isn’t jury tampering.

Whether there was tampering or not, he wasn't getting off. Even if people on the jury thought he was innocent they would have voted guilty by the pressure alone. Could you imagine the doxxing those people would receive for the rest of their lives if he had gotten off? No chance they wanted to have to live through the harassment they would receive starting last night if they had found him not guilty

 

[Spaceforce]

I just gave you my take. I said I’ll give the take on the next police shooting when it happens a couple hours from now

Lmfao dark but true

 

[Motodog]

Whether there was tampering or not, he wasn't getting off. Even if people on the jury thought he was innocent they would have voted guilty by the pressure alone. Could you imagine the doxxing those people would receive for the rest of their lives if he had gotten off? No chance they wanted to have to live through the harassment they would receive starting last night if they had found him not guilty

StealthChain nailed it

 

[AB19]

You guys make it seem like it is impossible for the jury to think he’s guilty and it only happened because of pressure

 

[Super Salt]

This thread sucks.

 

[Spaceforce]

This thread sucks.

Sucks more than a hooker on a Saturday night

 

[StealthChain]

You guys make it seem like it is impossible for the jury to think he’s guilty and it only happened because of pressure

Not at all, it's absolutely possible every member of the jury fully believed that he was guilty based on the information and evidence presented during the trial. But now you're making it seem like the pressure of this case wouldn't be enough to sway a jury members decision if they had doubts of his guilt for the given charges.

 

[32andBelow]

Not at all, it's absolutely possible every member of the jury fully believed that he was guilty based on the information and evidence presented during the trial. But now you're making it seem like the pressure of this case wouldn't be enough to sway a jury members decision if they had doubts of his guilt for the given charges.

How did they get pressured? They aren’t even allowed to watch the news. Plus I’d be more scared of the cops retaliating than anyone else.

 

[Billybob]

I am hammered ass drunk and there's not one thing that dumbass harvard map can do about it. Fucking harvard cunts and their uppity color schemes and deciiding whether I can go to work... they can suck my Ivy league nutsssss

2 weeks to flatten the curve!!!!!

 

[32andBelow]

I am hammered ass drunk and there's not one thing that dumbass harvard map can do about it. Fucking harvard cunts and their uppity color schemes and deciiding whether I can go to work... they can suck my Ivy league nutsssss

2 weeks to flatten the curve!!!!!

Just get the jab. Or print out a cdc card

 

[Billybob]

Just get the jab. Or print out a cdc card

Too late, I already done got jibby jabbed!

 

[32andBelow]

Too late, I already done got jibby jabbed!

So when you going to work?!

 

[Billybob]

So when you going to work?!

 

[StealthChain]

How did they get pressured? They aren’t even allowed to watch the news. Plus I’d be more scared of the cops retaliating than anyone else.

Do you not think that they had no idea about the riots that happened after george floyd's death? Just because they aren't allowed to watch the news doesn't mean they had no clue of the implications a "not guilty" verdict would have had. As far as cops go, there are much fewer cops in the country than there were rioters.