- Messages
- 3,522
Even the biased partisans on this website know a dud when they see one. If anything it’s gonna help Biden because people think smoking crack while getting your nuts marinated is pretty cool.
Even the biased partisans on this website know a dud when they see one. If anything it’s gonna help Biden because people think smoking crack while getting your nuts marinated is pretty cool.
It was a planned leak, the bidens know their target audience, they have now secured every crack smoking ukrainian oil exec's vote. Its over Drumpf!Not a single post about the Hunter Biden story?
Rudy Giuliani is the embodiment of fake news. A real stand up guy I’d say.
Dude is definitely wacko but your position is that the emails (regardless of how they were obtained or the timing of their release) are fabricated?Rudy Giuliani is the embodiment of fake news. A real stand up guy I’d say.
Tell me I’m wrong!
If it’s from Rudy I definitely don’t. He has no credibility in my opinion. Biden’s already been investigated by a Republican inquiry and was found of no wrong doing. This “scandal” is just a last ditch effort by trump campaign. Same way Hillary’s deleted emails are supposed to come out before this election according to the Trump campaign. Even if there was wrong doing, its not like Trumps kids are free from questionable and sketchy practices. But I expect the trump drones to eat this up.Dude is definitely wacko but your position is that the emails (regardless of how they were obtained or the timing of their release) are fabricated?
Just because you don't agree with how Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning obtained/disseminated material doesn't invalidate their evidence. Refusing to consider evidence because you don't like who presented it is a bit disingenuous.If it’s from Rudy I definitely don’t. He has no credibility in my opinion. Biden’s already been investigated by a Republican inquiry and was found of no wrong doing. This “scandal” is just a last ditch effort by trump campaign. Same way Hillary’s deleted emails are supposed to come out before this election according to the Trump campaign. Even if there was wrong doing, its not like Trumps kids are free from questionable and sketchy practices. But I expect the trump drones to eat this up.
Maybe you’ll get lucky, Kamala seems to enjoy locking up African Americans!I was promised Obama was going to prison
I love the trump law and order but Kamala is too law and order take. It’s one of the best.Maybe you’ll get lucky, Kamala seems to enjoy locking up African Americans!
That’s the problem though. It’s known how that material was obtained. This hunter story has been changed by Rudy and the shop owner multiple times just in the last day. The files on the NYPost story are PDFs not actually email files which makes it harder to authenticate. If you have the emails why not release them?Just because you don't agree with how Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning obtained/disseminated material doesn't invalidate their evidence. Refusing to consider evidence because you don't like who presented it is a bit disingenuous.
I'm with that. I thought the emails had been released.That’s the problem though. It’s known how that material was obtained. This hunter story has been changed by Rudy and the shop owner multiple times just in the last day. The files on the NYPost story are PDFs not actually email files which makes it harder to authenticate. If you have the emails why not release them?
You mean this “story”?
Not doubting you but sauce? Want to go see myself.4th quarter NCEPT panel suspended.
natca email just droppedNot doubting you but sauce? Want to go see myself.
I’m talking about how 2 weeks ago the trump campaign advisor (can’t remember his name, the one who paid for the abortion of a prostitute I think) said he has access to the deleted Clinton emails and is going to release them before the election. The trump party is just grasping at straws now and has lost almost all if not all credibility.Just because you don't agree with how Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning obtained/disseminated material doesn't invalidate their evidence. Refusing to consider evidence because you don't like who presented it is a bit disingenuous.