SnitchBot
ATSAP whisperer
- Messages
- 901
The fact these people can’t control their emotions is embarrassingSeems like they should be more worried about a Department of Labour complaint given that an NEC member was caught linking their videos.
I am just amazed that they literally had someone that was forced to resign as RVP be the lead speaker in the video and think that would bring credibility to the message. Just once again shows how removed these people are.
Two candidates said not to expect much.Is it just me or is this another video that seems to imply we better not expect much from negotiations?
All of the candidates suck and we are screwed.
I get that impression too, if these guys win they will get something like a 5% raise, 1.9% vs. 1.6%, and 10% Saturday shift differential and call it a "win". If so we vote not to ratify the contract even though every Fac Rep in the country will be up your ass to vote to approve.Is it just me or is this another video that seems to imply we better not expect much from negotiations?
All of the candidates suck and we are screwed.
Mick kept Robillard after Robillard was forced out of the ARVP role for cause. Just changed his title.Two candidates said not to expect much.
Rich and mick said they will get us everything we deserve.
Nick and Jamaal wanted to extend the contract this whole time and now are saying well don’t expect much. While using a former RVP who was removed for sleeping with a Natca employee to preach to us.
Give me the two candidates who are at least willing to fight
Since when do members have a say in ratification of a contract?I get that impression too, if these guys win they will get something like a 5% raise, 1.9% vs. 1.6%, and 10% Saturday shift differential and call it a "win". If so we vote not to ratify the contract even though every Fac Rep in the country will be up your ass to vote to approve.
Always. I think that’s like a law. The Alaska airlines flight attendents just voted their contract down. We just don’t have a in extending it. Cus the convention voted that down.Since when do members have a say in ratification of a contract?
Since foreverSince when do members have a say in ratification of a contract?
IIRC, they almost didn't get the numbers needed to ratify the Slate BookAlways. I think that’s like a law. The Alaska airlines flight attendents just voted their contract down. We just don’t have a in extending it. Cus the convention voted that down.
If you say so. I never got a vote on any of the past ones.Always. I think that’s like a law. The Alaska airlines flight attendents just voted their contract down. We just don’t have a in extending it. Cus the convention voted that down.
It was an online ratification.If you say so. I never got a vote on any of the past ones.
It is legit, just keep on the look out for online or paper ballots when the time comes around.If you say so. I never got a vote on any of the past ones.
I asked about how it was non partisan even though it came from a social club RVP and shared by NDJH account. Can it be verified that it was provided to Rich and Mick? Or is them posting it what they consider “providing to”Seems like they should be more worried about a Department of Labour complaint given that an NEC member was caught linking their videos.
Not going to lie, I am a bit out of it, can you reword this?I asked about how it was non partisan even though it came from a social club RVP and shared by NDJH account. Can it be verified that it was provided to Rich and Mick? Or is them posting it what they consider “providing to”