Stinger
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,521
Not sure. I assume it's to bring trainees back as well though.This is just OJT for folks already in the facility I assume. Nobody is being brought back, correct?
Not sure. I assume it's to bring trainees back as well though.This is just OJT for folks already in the facility I assume. Nobody is being brought back, correct?
I know it was mentioned a few weeks ago that they would, I haven't heard anything different.Are they going to sort the trainees into the different crews? Guessing yes but you never know.
Did they say anything about labs?I know it was mentioned a few weeks ago that they would, I haven't heard anything different.
Also, doesn't really change anything, but when facilities transition from 3 to 2 crews, or from 2 to 1 crew, Headquarters level must approve the transition.
Not that I heard.Did they say anything about labs?
Faceshields will be optional in addition to the masks
To make masks mandatory would require lots of negotiating Impact & Implementation
I don’t think that plan will work
Didn’t he say it was option. Based on the amount of controllers I see wearing masks I don’t think it’s going to be a problem.I don’t think that plan will work, some trainers and trainees will say the PPE is too cumbersome to work with, some will still say they are not comfortable to train with all that, other issues will occur and it will take way longer then expected to deliver the equipment and evaluate it. I would be fine training or training others that way but if you are going to make a spectical of it give us 10% Hazard Pay, people will be more likely to accept it that way.
MOPP4 muthafuckers!ZFW/D10/DFW will be the test facilities for faceshields, they'll arrive this week, and it'll be a three day test, and then they'll decide which faceshield to go with
Quick update for those that are high risk CPC's or CPC-IT's or just AG/D bands... No one knows when we are coming back, regardless of the traffic situation.
Correct, they can make a request but (obviously it depends on the Flight Surgeon) to bring high-risk back and then have a high-risk become infected? There is no fathomable way I can see a Flight Surgeon endangering a high risk individual's health much less making the Agency liable.Last I heard, facilities can make a request with the flight surgeon to bring high risk back. Sounds like they wouldn't make said request unless needed for staffing, and even then it'll be up to flight surgeon.
So.... 2021?
Frankly though I'd be pleasantly surprised if they didn't call us in same day as the no-cert BUEs.
*Glances at Memphis...*I’ve been saying it the whole, training is an after thought. CDC guidelines >>>>>
I’m horrible, I know ?