I didn’t say NCEPT reps set policy. You claimed they aren’t involved “at all” with anyone’s career and I explained why that is incorrect.
No you blamed your professional failures on your so called cucks like me. And yet I make none of these decisions.
So in other words “trust me bro”
Or don’t idc
Who’s bullshitting? You’re telling me that NCEPT quarterly selections aren’t going to be absolutely abysmal now thanks to the release policy pursuant to CRWG?
Didn’t say that either. But they weren’t as it was phased in for the first year
They certainly are resetting the program, in a manner that has every controller stuck for most or all of their career.
I’d assume the agency’s introduction of a contractor will be a massive setback towards whatever you’re trying to get out of this. Republicans are disgusting and viscous towards labor and without unions so is the private sector. So I’m sure day 1 was “what in the fuck are you guys doing letting all these people transfer?”
All because you pompous retards flock to the hill each May and think you know wtf you’re doing.
I’ve never been to NIW but it sounds like you should tell your RVP that you don’t want more staffing and you’re mad they asked congress for it.
You still have not provided one single point about how “the old system” was not in fact better than the bullshit we have now.
Dont know why you can’t read English but I never said that. Just that it’s moved more.
You’re “there’s more movement under NCEPT” argument is null and void until selections are where they were and NCEPT is not holistically “better” until it fosters actual movement and not just for those at facilities with good staffing.
Try telling agency you think a better plan for what you consider to be ‘actual movement’ means pulling more people out of staffing triggers. Good luck.
The old system cared about neither and it worked provided you networked a bit and weren’t a shitbag.
Shitbags levy that same complaint against ‘good ol boy NCEPT’
Yeah and then you dipshits [NATCA] gets involved and now the membership is getting leapfrogged by OTS new hires instead.
The BU chose to skip the 8-9s. The one pick at a time model that’s been in place for years reduced the effectiveness of spamming the top of the priority list. Because you need to be ranked at the top. So the 8-9s have been available in the first round for years.
At least a given AT washout could’ve been a prior experience hire who has some prowess to certify somewhere and could be useful to the NAS.
The union has successfully fought to retain cpc it training failures for years. Even after multiple washouts
You act like sending 18 year olds with zero experience to 8s and 9s over stuck CPCs somehow puts us all in a better place.
Well they represent the controllers at the 8-9s as well and not enough people were applying.
Which is a bullshit take in and of itself from the union. This energy from you and other reps sitting at your level 12 facilities is not the flex you think it is, especially since NATCA flat out refuses to negotiate for better pay. Just saying after you expressed your concerns about what “the membership” thinks.
You sound like a spurned washout. Why don’t you get your head out of your ass and certify and you won’t have to stress about exploiting your failures to beat the cpc to where you both wanna go.
