the inquirer
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 434
Anyone else have an issue with Natca selling BLM tshirts? BLM website states some very odd things that they believe in and stand for. I don’t believe many Natca members push for single parent families.....
That doesn’t sound like SOLIDARITY BROTHER.Anyone else have an issue with Natca selling BLM tshirts? BLM website states some very odd things that they believe in and stand for. I don’t believe many Natca members push for single parent families.....
Anyone else have an issue with Natca selling BLM tshirts? BLM website states some very odd things that they believe in and stand for. I don’t believe many Natca members push for single parent families.....
Yes. Many people are appalled at it, but afraid of being accused of being racist.
I come from a country where slavery and persecution is much more recent than what happened in the US. I know what it is to grow up on welfare and not know the language and get beat up just because you are not “American”. No racism here. Just a question of why my Natca dollars would support an organization that doesn’t support basic family morals.I'm fairly sure the narrative is that if you're of Caucasian descent then you were born a racist and if you haven't actively de-racist'd yourself then you're still a racist.
In my defense that was my first call listening in so I was only referencing that specific time.I'm not trying to get into a contest... but it's literally been said multiple times on multiple RVP calls in multiple regions. It's not really debatable.
I come from a country where slavery and persecution is much more recent than what happened in the US. I know what it is to grow up on welfare and not know the language and get beat up just because you are not “American”. No racism here. Just a question of why my Natca dollars would support an organization that doesn’t support basic family morals.
why my Natca dollars would support an organization that doesn’t support basic family morals.
you do everyone a disservice when you conflate the organization with the movement.
Is it not a disservice to the cause/movement to take on the form of what the organization calls for? If they wanted to support black lives mattering while not aligning with the organization they shouldn't take on the name of the organization.Alright guys I know it’s fun to call BLM Marxist traitors or whatever but you do everyone a disservice when you conflate the organization with the movement. I admit it’s confusing and maybe even a little nefarious by the group to use its platform to advance those positions but it’s possible to support black lives matter as a cause without wanting to get a tattoo of Stalin.
Not according to “Laces Out” TinAlright guys I know it’s fun to call BLM Marxist traitors or whatever but you do everyone a disservice when you conflate the organization with the movement. I admit it’s confusing and maybe even a little nefarious by the group to use its platform to advance those positions but it’s possible to support black lives matter as a cause without wanting to get a tattoo of Stalin.
you don’t have to buy a shirt man.The onus is not on "me" to define anything or provide anyone a service. This divisive politcal movement should not have been forced upon a federal workforce by the union, and slim speaks for thousands by giving voice to that obvious truth.
It can be the most amazing righteous cause in the history of the world, but if its polarizing and divisive; why should it be shoved down our throats. Let us work planes and complain about NCEPT!
“Another point for Melosh!”you don’t have to buy a shirt man.
Melosh is a shid ass tennis player bruh“Another point for Melosh!”
Don’t come at me with Seinfeld knowledge, breh. I compared PT to Melosh a few weeks ago. Something like “this is who you’re arguing with”.Melosh is a shid ass tennis player bruh