Robert_Boucher
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 851
I wonder if there's any correlation between that law change and the fail rates going up?they ended that law a few years ago. It’s regular beer now.
I wonder if there's any correlation between that law change and the fail rates going up?they ended that law a few years ago. It’s regular beer now.
Once AGAIN, PT nails it.TOTALLY disagree. One man's "separation not ensured" is another man's , you had situational awareness and were "watching it". I cant think of many more subjective things tbh. obviously a true loss of actual lateral/vertical speaks for itself, but its way more grey than that
You’ve got a fan, PushingTin !Once AGAIN, PT nails it.
That’s literally the point I was making. Yeah sure there are some things that are black and white but if you do something that’s outside of his expectations for running the problem he’ll nail you for not being efficient or whatever bullshit catch all mark down they have.TOTALLY disagree. One man's "separation not ensured" is another man's , you had situational awareness and were "watching it". I cant think of many more subjective things tbh. obviously a true loss of actual lateral/vertical speaks for itself, but its way more grey than that
You’ve got a fan, PushingTin !
That’s literally the point I was making. Yeah sure there are some things that are black and white but if you do something that’s outside of his expectations for running the problem he’ll nail you for not being efficient or whatever bullshit catch all mark down they have.
Well I’m glad we agree then!and that’s OUR point .... if you run a problem and show you got what it takes - you don’t get the delay points deducted. If you suck, they grab the catch all.
it similar to an OJTI in the field. If you own up to your mistake and learn from it - it’s probably not gonna be on the -25, maybe a positive control write up. You pull an attitude or argue with me? a1 all day.
Let us be miserable!You three are literally arguing semantics...
lol I’m not some master manipulator trying to get under your skin. I’m prone to my fair share of trolling but it’s not personal. We’re all equal in this hell scape called point65.maybe in another life. I feel like this is a trap... this isn't the shoot the shit thread. might get locked.
Depends, we have OJTIs that write up A1 for no actual losses or situations that you fixand that’s OUR point .... if you run a problem and show you got what it takes - you don’t get the delay points deducted. If you suck, they grab the catch all.
it similar to an OJTI in the field. If you own up to your mistake and learn from it - it’s probably not gonna be on the -25, maybe a positive control write up. You pull an attitude or argue with me? a1 all day.
Depends, we have OJTIs that right up A1 for no actual losses or situations that you fix
Overis this at a level <8 or >9? (fake 12's don't count either)
Over
Yeah. “Oh well you descended this guy to xxx and realized he clips this higher terrain and stopped him above it, but you gave the initial clearance below the terrain, so A1”well, that's just shitty.
Yeah. “Oh well you descended this guy to xxx and realized he clips this higher terrain and stopped him above it, but you gave the initial clearance below the terrain, so A1”
?
but I'd read other forum posts from Academy grads who claim they'd barely passed the academic bits but were great at separating planes. Is this common?
There’s always idiot savants I guessNot a "recent" grad - but how do you "barely" pass academics? It's only worth like 5 or 10% of your grade? You literally can't fail it. Unless you mean 0%? In which case... see my earlier point, it barely matters.
And if you mean basics... and you barely passed that.... good freaking luck.
There’s always idiot savants I guess
Thanks for taking time to respond! Yeah, not having been across the street yet, I don't have a firm grasp myself on what people are referring to. I know that at least one guy here said he "had some of the worst book test scores and passed 3rd in [his] class, doesn’t mean you’re out if you score low on the CKT". Perhaps that helps give more context?Not a "recent" grad - but how do you "barely" pass academics? It's only worth like 5 or 10% of your grade? You literally can't fail it. Unless you mean 0%? In which case... see my earlier point, it barely matters.
And if you mean basics... and you barely passed that.... good freaking luck.
Thanks for taking time to respond! Yeah, not having been across the street yet, I don't have a firm grasp myself on what people are referring to. I know that at least one guy here said he "had some of the worst book test scores and passed 3rd in [his] class, doesn’t mean you’re out if you score low on the CKT". Perhaps that helps give more context?
Ahhh, that makes a lot of sense. Thanks so much for the helpful explanation!I assume this is referring to the academics part of tower/enroute, which when they initially started the scoring rubric vs subjective pass/fail, was worth like 10% of your grade. You needed 70 overall points to pass, and 10 of them were from academics. Basically, if you ran all the sims perfect but bombed the paper tests, you'd still have a 90. The point is, the block exams/academics are weighted, and while they can help, you shouldn't be banking on those since it's relatively worth a small portion of the overall grade. PM me if you want more info.