32andBelow
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 10,630
It’s nice when a sup can be monitoring a busy session and actually see a traffic conflict you might be missing.
Generally speaking (across a good portion of professions), people who are trained in management aren't necessarily able to perform the duties of the people they are in charge of. Their job isn't to perform the job, it's to manage the people who are performing the job.I don't want anyone in charge of something that they can't do themselves.
Certainly. Personally when I'm CIC I aim for this. I don't think you need to be able to CPC at any specific facility to be able to spot conflicts/issues. I did a fam once to a higher level and was catching issues left and right.It’s nice when a sup can be monitoring a busy session and actually see a traffic conflict you might be missing.
I hope you let them know!I did a fam once to a higher level and was catching issues left and right.
I always try to work the traffic of the controllers when I visit a facility I want to ERR to. They always say “hey thanks, man!”I hope you let them know!
Effective May 1st, there was an update to the 3120.4R. Deals with number of positions that a supervisor has to certify on.This is fair. You don't have to be able to work the push to have a general idea of what's going on.
Also, having only been certified in low and mid level facilities, maybe I have a disconnect here. At our lower level towers, it was often useful for our Supes to work LC even when it was busy so that training could be accomplished on GC/FD. At the mid-level, our supes were only ever really needed if we needed to split a position, and at that point the split positions weren't that complex. They sat on the desk, but paid only a little bit of attention to us. We typically brought it to their attention when something needed to be split, not the other way around. At the high level, it seems that OS rarely take position, but keep a close eye on things so that they can determine what to split, what to close, what to help coordinate, etc. Again, this doesn't mean they have to be able to work the heavy stuff, but they should be trained enough on the area and some positions to have a feel for the operation.
It seemed most supes at the high level I'm looking at had 1 or 2 positions at most before.Effective May 1st, there was an update to the 3120.4R. Deals with number of positions that a supervisor has to certify on.
ARTCC: 1 radar position and 1 associate position.
9-12 TRACON: 1 arrival and 1 departure. Unless it's got separate areas, then 2 control positions would be required.
9-12 up/down: 1 ground and 1 local plus 1 arrival and 1 departure. Unless that tracon has separate areas then it's 2 control positions in the tracon again.
9-12 tower: 1 ground and 1 local.
8 and below terminal: full facility. Unless it's got multiple areas (like AZO) then 2 control positions in each area of supervision.
This is a joke, and is going to hinder supervisors respect, if they had any.Effective May 1st, there was an update to the 3120.4R. Deals with number of positions that a supervisor has to certify on.
ARTCC: 1 radar position and 1 associate position.
9-12 TRACON: 1 arrival and 1 departure. Unless it's got separate areas, then 2 control positions would be required.
9-12 up/down: 1 ground and 1 local plus 1 arrival and 1 departure. Unless that tracon has separate areas then it's 2 control positions in the tracon again.
9-12 tower: 1 ground and 1 local.
8 and below terminal: full facility. Unless it's got multiple areas (like AZO) then 2 control positions in each area of supervision.
It’s higher than it used to be tho…This is a joke, and is going to hinder supervisors respect, if they had any.
Luckily it says a “minimum” required, so it can be negotiated to be higher.
I'm sure there's going to be a ton grandfathered in.Effective May 1st, there was an update to the 3120.4R. Deals with number of positions that a supervisor has to certify on.
ARTCC: 1 radar position and 1 associate position.
9-12 TRACON: 1 arrival and 1 departure. Unless it's got separate areas, then 2 control positions would be required.
9-12 up/down: 1 ground and 1 local plus 1 arrival and 1 departure. Unless that tracon has separate areas then it's 2 control positions in the tracon again.
9-12 tower: 1 ground and 1 local.
8 and below terminal: full facility. Unless it's got multiple areas (like AZO) then 2 control positions in each area of supervision.
They made ours start training to meet the new requirementI'm sure there's going to be a ton grandfathered in.
I sense a management shortage in 20 years when the level 5 tower can't come to the 11 and get ground
Nah. Not until they require certifying on busy traffic.I'm sure there's going to be a ton grandfathered in.
I sense a management shortage in 20 years when the level 5 tower can't come to the 11 and get ground
No negotiation required. If the ATM wants their brand new supervisor at F11 to certify throughout the building, then that's what will happen.This is a joke, and is going to hinder supervisors respect, if they had any.
Luckily it says a “minimum” required, so it can be negotiated to be higher.
I'm not sure what it was before, but I know a 9 up/down where they certified throughout (like 13 total positions.)It’s higher than it used to be tho…
It only impacts people that transfer and re-enter the training process at a new facility.I'm sure there's going to be a ton grandfathered in.
I sense a management shortage in 20 years when the level 5 tower can't come to the 11 and get ground
Hmmm Supes with only 2 D-Sides at a level 12 Z with only tower experience. This outta be interesting if not amusingEffective May 1st, there was an update to the 3120.4R. Deals with number of positions that a supervisor has to certify on.
ARTCC: 1 radar position and 1 associate position.
They're exempt since they're already in the building.Hmmm Supes with only 2 D-Sides at a level 12 Z with only tower experience. This outta be interesting if not amusing
That you, DAB??No negotiation required. If the ATM wants their brand new supervisor at F11 to certify throughout the building, then that's what will happen.
There's no TRB or timeline that is required, so if someone was in training for 5+ years, that's still allowed.
Nah...I'd like to spend some time at F11 though.That you, DAB??
Shit, you and me both. My reply was a joke on the fact that there was someone in training at DAB for 4 years. They very well may still be in training as I type this.Nah...I'd like to spend some time at F11 though.
Yah center you only needed 1 d side. You didn’t even need a radar cert. now you need 1 radar. But in a center they can usually just split off something that is super easy for themNo negotiation required. If the ATM wants their brand new supervisor at F11 to certify throughout the building, then that's what will happen.
There's no TRB or timeline that is required, so if someone was in training for 5+ years, that's still allowed.
I'm not sure what it was before, but I know a 9 up/down where they certified throughout (like 13 total positions.)
Centers it's seemed like they've been doing 1 radar/associate for a long time now?
It only impacts people that transfer and re-enter the training process at a new facility.
This whole idea baffles me. ATC is the only job I’ve ever worked where my superiors aren’t qualified, and in some cases, aren’t even capable of performing job functions of the people they’re supposedly managing. My raises are dependent on evaluations from supervisors who aren’t qualified to be a D-Side on the position I’m currently working. The supes in my area only become D-side certified on the least complex positions in the area. I’ve seen supes who spend more time on Amazon shopping than working positions. It’s pretty difficult to respect that.Generally speaking (across a good portion of professions), people who are trained in management aren't necessarily able to perform the duties of the people they are in charge of. Their job isn't to perform the job, it's to manage the people who are performing the job.