GulfBravoPapa
⭐SuperStar
- Messages
- 2,079
Bryan Zilonis is the Great Lakes region RVP.
Another Interesting point of order here courtesy of Brian Zilonis website...
"PAC Contributions: Currently, there are no briefings and/or information given to the Executive Board regarding our Union's PAC contributions from the PAC Advisory Board. It is too easy under current practices to mischaracterize contributions. For example, an explanation of how this money is spent could be that 58% of contributions support Democratic candidates and 42% support Republican candidates. This does not truly capture all expenses associated with the PAC and excludes administrative costs and other spending, like NATCA's Boots on the Ground program.
Because of this lack of transparency, PAC money is spent with no communication to the Executive Board or the membership. Currently, if a member has questions about how their PAC dollars are being spent, they are forced to go through Federal Election Commission files."
I'm not the least bit surprised that money is being spent without members knowing what it's being spent on.
Bryan Zilonis on Privatization:
Championing this specific, failed legislation, with no guarantee of how it would impact our members was irresponsible and in direct opposition to the will of the Convention body. Additionally, it alienated long-standing allies on the Hill.
I will continue to support being in the room and at the negotiating table to protect our Union and our members' rights. Through transparency and serving the will of our entire membership, I know our Union will make great strides in all challenges we face today and tomorrow.”
I am drafting a list of questions for the candidates and reaching out to them, does anyone have questions they wish me to include? Should they respond I will happily post the responses here on .65.
I've looked over Mr. Zilonis' website and while I am onboard with most if not all of his proposed changes, there is very little info on how he intends to do these things. Plenty of WHAT and very little HOW. How is he proposing to publish the information on PAC donations? A quarterly report or something of that nature? Will expenditures be itemized? In addition, will simply publishing that information be sufficient in his eyes? Or should every decision to spend money be made by vote during meetings of the Executive Board?
Re: privatization, what allies on Capitol Hill has NATCA "alienated"? I'm not a fan of vague assertions and promises, even if I agree with the sentiment completely. How does Mr. Zilonis propose to be "in the room" helping shape legislation if he isn't prepared to support the legislation that comes out of the room? What would a non-flawed bill look like? Would it include any form of privatization? Should any decision to support a particular piece of legislation be subject to approval by the bargaining unit? Or does he feel that NATCA shouldn't take a position at all?
Do you have a question for Bryan? Send them to [email protected]
lifted that from a facebook post.
I know that he just publicly announced a few days ago and while the platform is laid out, there hasn't been alot of question answering. If you find the facebook page there was a pretty good discussion about his views on privatization.
I've looked over Mr. Zilonis' website and while I am onboard with most if not all of his proposed changes, there is very little info on how he intends to do these things. Plenty of WHAT and very little HOW. How is he proposing to publish the information on PAC donations? A quarterly report or something of that nature? Will expenditures be itemized? In addition, will simply publishing that information be sufficient in his eyes? Or should every decision to spend money be made by vote during meetings of the Executive Board?
Re: privatization, what allies on Capitol Hill has NATCA "alienated"? I'm not a fan of vague assertions and promises, even if I agree with the sentiment completely. How does Mr. Zilonis propose to be "in the room" helping shape legislation if he isn't prepared to support the legislation that comes out of the room? What would a non-flawed bill look like? Would it include any form of privatization? Should any decision to support a particular piece of legislation be subject to approval by the bargaining unit? Or does he feel that NATCA shouldn't take a position at all?
Or he can come here an answer en masse...Bryan will be putting out more information. Plans, etc. If you would like to ask him questions directly, please email him at [email protected] or call him at 4408646085.
I know Bryan would love to be able to visit every facility, but that is a financial impossibility. Not being the incumbent, he is at a disadvantage, in that he can not travel the country under the guise of NATCA business. He has a plan and some ideas on how to reach out to each member. He will also be at convention next week, so if anyone is going to be there, grab him, talk to him. 🙂