I'm only at the academy myself, but that seems pretty clear, legally speaking.
From the .65...
3–8–2. Consider an aircraft cleared for stop-and-go as an arriving aircraft until it comes to a complete stop, and thereafter as a departing aircraft.
3–9–6. Separate a departing aircraft from a preceding departing or arriving aircraft using the same runway by ensuring that it does not begin takeoff roll until: b. a preceding landing aircraft is clear of the runway.
I'm only at the academy myself, but that seems pretty clear, legally speaking. You can say it's safe if you tell the departure to delay departure roll until the arrival is clear, but it's not legal.
So at this point, as usual, it's the semantics of either cleared stop and go with tower calling the go, or cleared to land and hold position pretty much....
Basically. I've always done "cleared to land and I'll call your departure."So at this point, as usual, it's the semantics of either cleared stop and go with tower calling the go, or cleared to land and hold position pretty much....
So just say cleared to land I'll call your goYou can used reduced Rwy sep if they’re both full stops. Cat 1 to Cat 1 3000 feet. If the guy behind the guy landing is a stop and go, that’s illegal. That’s a deal bro.
"cleared stop-and-go, but don't stop until beyond taxiway A4."
How about including “if able” in the transmission?I don't think this is legal. It works, I'm sure, but I don't think it'd hold up in court.
I’ve said “Unable stop and go, cleared to land, I’ll call your departure on the runway” multiple times just this week.