Every sentence. The ‘probably crwg’ sentence is fine because that’s just someone’s best guess.Which part? Lol
Every sentence. The ‘probably crwg’ sentence is fine because that’s just someone’s best guess.Which part? Lol
None of the RVPs care about scabs on the internetMaybe our RVP would like to know about the amount of pompous shit talking from you toward others who don’t know any better, that’s kinda the reason your position exists. I have never seen someone so condescending to others for inherent ignorance when you’re about the only resource they have on movement.
You mean NATCA members on the internet. Well we’ll ascertain that shortly then, won’t we?None of the RVPs care about scabs on the internet
NATCA members can ask questions and use volunteer resources anytime they want. Stop lying to people on the internet and you won’t get called out for lying to people on the internet.You mean NATCA members on the internet. Well we’ll ascertain that shortly then, won’t we?
Oh I fully intend to use volunteer resources lol.NATCA members can ask questions and use volunteer resources anytime they want. Stop lying to people on the internet and you won’t get called out for lying to people on the internet.
NATCA code of conduct would tend to disagree with you.No one owes you shit on this site btw. You’re welcome.
And they [NATCA] are giving their best conceded effort to break it moreDamn I can’t even imagine how annoying I’d be if I was trying to transfer. This shit is so broken
The May PPT is posted and doesn’t show any different staffing numbers, but still no rules so it’s anybody’s guess.When do we get access to see these new facility numbers finalized? Will that be available before the panel actually runs?
I heard they were hammering out the final details today for the new CRWG numbers to go into effect on this May panel.The May PPT is posted and doesn’t show any different staffing numbers, but still no rules so it’s anybody’s guess.
That makes sense, I’m sure there are a lot out there dying to know since it’s set to change very shortly.I heard they were hammering out the final details today for the new CRWG numbers to go into effect on this May panel.
In the reauth I believe they were directed to implement the new numbers by April of this year.
If you’re a member you can ask your rep all the questions you like.Oh I fully intend to use volunteer resources lol
No it wasn’t. It was some clown on here making shit up and I called him out on spreading lies and you went full snowflake defending the misinformation machine.And show me where I’ve lied to anyone on here. The whole SAT thing (which was a while back and I’ve forgotten about) was a miscommunication with you and someone else at worst. And was a disappointing rampage on your behalf at best.
I mean the guy had asked several people at SAT about what was going on so I wouldn’t call that “making shit up” but reach farther I guess. Even if he was wrong so what, I still don’t see where I’m spreading lies in here.If you’re a member you can ask your rep all the questions you like.
No it wasn’t. It was some clown on here making shit up and I called him out on spreading lies and you went full snowflake defending the misinformation machine.
You forgot about it cuz you guys were all wrong about everything.
They either need to delay the whole panel and get the rules and crwg hammered out, or run the panel with the last set of rules and try again in August or whatever. Not sure which side is insisting on this rushed timeline.I heard they were hammering out the final details today for the new CRWG numbers to go into effect on this May panel.
In the reauth I believe they were directed to implement the new numbers by April of this year.
Or just let people go home and be with their families and not be de-moralized in a shit facility they don’t want to be inThey either need to delay the whole panel and get the rules and crwg hammered out, or run the panel with the last set of rules and try again in August or whatever. Not sure which side is insisting on this rushed timeline.
As an individual who tried for 6 years to leave, and never have shit lined up right, I get it. Personally, I gave up after having too many kids. My family moved here haha.Or just let people go home and be with their families and not be de-moralized in a shit facility they don’t want to be in
At a level 8 up/down. Staffing already sucks. Why does it matter if they let people go? The facility will always runAs an individual who tried for 6 years to leave, and never have shit lined up right, I get it. Personally, I gave up after having too many kids. My family moved here haha.
Idk if there is a right answer to get you (aka everyone who wants to move) what you want, while not boning facilities you (everyone who wants to move) are currently at.
You stuck in mid level hell? ( like I was until I just surrendered)
I just went back and read through the reauth and it's written in the law itself which was signed passed Jan 3, 2024 and signed May 16, 2024 that the plan to implement the CRWG should be put into place within one year of the signing. There is a 90 day window after the date of enactment, which is may, where they could brief congress on why they weren't able to implement the plan fully. I think this is the reason why they're trying to squeeze it out ASAP.They either need to delay the whole panel and get the rules and crwg hammered out, or run the panel with the last set of rules and try again in August or whatever. Not sure which side is insisting on this rushed timeline.
(c) REQUIRED IMPLEMENTATION OF IDENTIFIED STAFFING MODEL.—(1) USE OF STAFFING MODEL.—The Administrator shall, as appropriate, take such action that may be necessary to implement and use the staffing model identified by the Transportation Research Board pursuant to subsection(b)(1)(D), including any recommendations for improving such model, not later than one year after enactment of this Act.
(2) BRIEFING.—Not later than 90 days after taking such actions to implement and use the staffing model identified by the Transportation Research Board pursuant to subsection(b)(1)(D), the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress regarding the reasons for why any recommendation by the Transportation Research Board study was not incorporated into the implemented staffing model.