pointSixtyFive

New NCEPT MOU

157 replies · 23,957 views · Page 4 of 8

  1. 32andBelow #61
    Tater_Toad said:

    Because then you get the good ole boys mentality creating a toxic workplace and violating the EEOC in a way that is impossible to stop

    That can be fixed. It can be an interview panel or whatever. You can treat it like every other job in the world

  2. PlasticBag12 #62
    Tater_Toad said:

    Because then you get the good ole boys mentality creating a toxic workplace and violating the EEOC in a way that is impossible to stop

    Instead you get some bullshit lottery/raffle system with rules that take up 18 pages. Would be wise of them to post openings, have candidates apply and interview all candidates interested in a posted position. Then work from the top down on who can get released or receive a deviation or whatever. That’s how you get best qualified candidates for roles. Not a lottery or winner bids worst spot system.

  3. Move78 #63
    PlasticBag12 said:

    Instead you get some bullshit lottery/raffle system with rules that take up 18 pages. Would be wise of them to post openings, have candidates apply and interview all candidates interested in a posted position. Then work from the top down on who can get released or receive a deviation or whatever. That’s how you get best qualified candidates for roles. Not a lottery or winner bids worst spot system.

    Pffff this mf out here with “best qualified”

  4. PlasticBag12 #64
    Move78 said:

    Pffff this mf out here with “best qualified”

    Do you have any ideas for how to make this process better than some random lottery system or are you just here to talk shit?

    Every job in the public sector has an application, interview, and selection process. But for some reason ATC needs to be treated differently.

  5. 32andBelow #65
    PlasticBag12 said:

    Instead you get some bullshit lottery/raffle system with rules that take up 18 pages. Would be wise of them to post openings, have candidates apply and interview all candidates interested in a posted position. Then work from the top down on who can get released or receive a deviation or whatever. That’s how you get best qualified candidates for roles. Not a lottery or winner bids worst spot system.

    There should be no release system. If you’re hired you go. If the FAA can’t keep somewhere staffed they should pay more, offer term bids either move money, etc.

  6. Tater_Toad OP #66
    32andBelow said:

    There should be no release system. If you’re hired you go. If the FAA can’t keep somewhere staffed they should pay more, offer term bids either move money, etc.

    If my pay doubled I would stop bitching and start writing quality -25's again

  7. 32andBelow #67
    Tater_Toad said:

    If my pay doubled I would stop bitching and start writing quality -25's again

    You think anyone reads them? Only if they want to wash someone out

  8. DankVectorz #68
    32andBelow said:

    You think anyone reads them? Only if they want to wash someone out

    Some are read. They don’t like my “traffic was so light this session did nothing but waste the trainees limited hours and no learning occurred” -25’s

  9. Billybob #69

    Are they not going to publish the list so I can get banged out of a transfer again or what

  10. Spoony90 #70
    32andBelow said:

    You think anyone reads them? Only if they want to wash someone out

    They do read them. I used emojis once and the district got all weird about it

  11. Billybob #71

    The list is published, I just can’t upload it from my phone

  12. Shikaka #72
    Spoony90 said:

    They do read them. I used emojis once and the district got all weird about it

    UwU

  13. Pickle Switch #73

    I will never understand this shit. We are well over TSL, projected well over TSL with a handful of trainees to finish. No outbounds, and a selection would not take us below the TSL. Yet it says 0 Primary Releases??? WTF?!

  14. KiloZulu #74
    DankVectorz said:

    Some are read. They don’t like my “traffic was so light this session did nothing but waste the trainees limited hours and no learning occurred” -25’s

    We had one controller get written up because they spent the d-side trainee's entire -25 talking shit about the r-side

  15. 32andBelow #75
    Billybob said:

    The list is published, I just can’t upload it from my phone

    Where?

  16. KP-ATC #76
    Spoony90 said:

    They do read them. I used emojis once and the district got all weird about it

    How many eggplant emojis per sheet?

  17. Homsar #77
    Billybob said:

    The list is published, I just can’t upload it from my phone

    What? The panel is tomorrow.

  18. Billybob #78
    32andBelow said:

    Where?

    NATCA NCEPT site, I just meant the PPT

  19. ManBearPig #79
    Pickle Switch said:

    I will never understand this shit. We are well over TSL, projected well over TSL with a handful of trainees to finish. No outbounds, and a selection would not take us below the TSL. Yet it says 0 Primary Releases??? WTF?!

    Are you at an Academy sourced trainee facility?

  20. 32andBelow #80
    ManBearPig said:

    Are you at an Academy sourced trainee facility?

    It’s incredible the amount of new terms they come up with every day

Archived from pointSixtyFive. The thread is closed to new posts.