mnsalty
And by something bad what I’m saying if there is 1 controller when there should have been More and could have been more to handle the traffic and an accident occurs the public will not understand or care that the workforce wanted to protect itself rather than the flying public....make sense?
The public isn't going to know, understand, or care that it was a result of reduced staffing. The general public thinks we wave orange wands on the ramp. The vast majority of controllers at home couldn't affect opening positions that are combined anyways, but I guess that's not really what you're driving at.
I've re-read your posts like 10 times, and overall, I'm really struggling to understand the point you're even trying to make.
Either way, nobody is going to be torn apart any more than they already were, and there aren't going to be an PR disasters because a controller having an error or denying a practice approach isn't making national news. God forbid it's something worse, it'll make nat news, but ATC likely won't be the focus of it. NATCA will send out an email saying everything is peaches and rainbows, that we should privatize (err, correction, "need a consistent source of funding"), and thank everyone for "doing a good job" and "remind us to help protect our brothers and sisters" while "standing in solidarity." Sound like every NATCA email ever? The folks who previously loved NATCA will still love em, and the folks who already hated them will just grow more hate, and nothing changes.