And yet, they still chose a rip-the-bandaid-off method.
CRWG
- Thread starter CaptainObvious
- Start date
All those processes have changed over the past year. And the new NRP moved the possible losses back up to 212 so the available transfers didn’t tank on day 1
- Messages
- 35
- Facility
- A80 Atlanta Tracon
Was there any consideration for our brothers and sisters who are stuck in black hole 4-7s, getting their number increased hopelessly out of reach, who have been CPC for 5-10 years with paperwork in watching AGs getting direct placed to desirable/easy-to-leave facilities they would kill to go to? It just seems like there were a lot of sacrificial lambs for this change to occur and I'm curious if their voices were heard and the NRP was adjusted to account for the forsaken?
Last edited:
The 4-7s account for a massive majority of the movements. The newer NRP is much more liberal in release criteria. Which will almost certainly get blowback from the ~90%+ of the total of cpcs that aren’t requesting transfer.
32andBelow
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 10,636
More liberal but your number is way higher.
- Messages
- 35
- Facility
- A80 Atlanta Tracon
I was mainly referring to the facilities that went from very well staffed to critically staffed overnight. The controllers there who wanted to leave just had their lives ruined.
32andBelow
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 10,636
They couldn’t even try out the old staffing numbers before making new staffing numbers. Were our predecessor stupid or something?
Some numbers went down and some up and some sideways. The amount of available movement is almost the same as it was last month.
They didn’t use the old numbers because AFN decided that their accountants knew better than Ops. FAA Reauth made it law
If they’re critically staffed they need more controllers not less. The new (already years old) crwg is the only way for the agency to staff it. A necessity to save those imprisoned in 6 day weeks and doomed to an early grave.
- Messages
- 35
- Facility
- A80 Atlanta Tracon
The problem is many of these facilities are not critically staffed in reality. We're talking places that have used less than 5 overtime shifts so far this year going from 100% staffed to 60% staffed on paper.
I’d assume you’re an RVP? Speaking with such confidence on behalf of so “many”facilities you don’t work at.
It’s possible these multiple facilities with the exact same ot usage you’re referring to are either: receiving a crwg that’s too high or not calling in ot enough or calling it and no one takes it or not scheduling ot enough or negotiated guidelines too low to compensate for an old crwg that was too low etc.
All of these are debatable btw and Im expressing no opinion here on behalf of facilities I know nothing about. But if you want to change your CRWG you need to hop in a Time Machine and run for FacRep 3 years ago.
But_I_Had_Visual
Trusted Contributor
- Messages
- 136
You guys are all barking up the wrong tree trying to come after this dude about anything NCEPT/CRWG related. He seems to have insider knowledge or maybe even sits on the panels🧐. Don’t get me wrong, he has some shit takes referring to other topics. Credit where credit is due though. If it involves ncept in any shape or form, this guy does not miss.
- Messages
- 35
- Facility
- A80 Atlanta Tracon
I didn't realize I needed to be an RVP to gather information and opinions on affected facilities. Ask some people at Rochester or the many other places that got absolutely crushed by these changes with no recourse what they think of their new numbers. You're going to find a lot of pissed off controllers who blame NATCA.
GulfBravoPapa
⭐SuperStar
- Messages
- 2,112
Which Rochester?
- Messages
- 35
- Facility
- A80 Atlanta Tracon
Either one.
