Yap, I’m with ncssailor on that one. Guarantee you that’s just what the agency used to jerk off NATCA under the table and sell them on it. Makes me wonder what was parlayed with the airlines to make them reduce traffic for the cutover period…
Although, I will say when it comes to smaller facilities absorbing others, as the TCI stands, if the airspace/airports being absorbed are slow, it can result in no change in facility level, it can even result in a downgrade if the additional stuff being bought is slow enough. It all has to do with effectively buying more airspace but potentially working less traffic relative to it.
Higher level facilities have the “bravo cushion” equations in the TCI which gives this particular kind of thing much less potential for them.
Put simply, you can buy all the airspace you want. But if you want to get upgraded, you gotta have the traffic to go with it.