I don't think its a logical argument that there shouldn't* be some sort of 'penalty' for putting in and then turning down a facility when you get it. Doing that necessarily fu*&s over someone else and bogs down the system. Obviously you may have a sincere or important reason to turn it down, but that should not preclude some sort of ban on you doing that again for a set time (1 year imo). Its sort of human nature that the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and we can see that with these first iterations of NCEPT. Even though we have very good working conditions as outlined in the Slate book, there will always be the couple people in each facility who push every single Article to the extreme, and force revisions. Is it selfish? Obviously that goes without saying. The sky is blue and the grass is green too. That said, I like that there are those people. It keeps everything honest and acts as a natural check on the other people who like sheep refuse to question anything and will allow themselves to be taken advantage of under the guise of "this is a good job. I dont agree w grieving things. at my last job we couldnt do that. " etc.
Penalize the NCEPT scammers. If you put in for somewhere, you should be willing to go. Cut the shit. thx bye,