WavesAndClouds said:Can we get the most recent PPT spreadsheet in here?
Priority Placement Tool
-
#241 -
#242 This shows OKC at 86 percent but no one got released? Asking cause I have an ERR out. But I wasn’t selected. Nor was I even on the list
-
#243 Spoony90 said:
This shows OKC at 86 percent but no one got released? Asking cause I have an ERR out. But I wasn’t selected. Nor was I even on the list
I'm going to take a guess that you have a brand new CPC that just got certified in the last month or so. Tell me if I'm wrong.
-
#244 Phanatical said:
I'm going to take a guess that you have a brand new CPC that just got certified in the last month or so. Tell me if I'm wrong.
You’re not wrong. But this PTT is useless correct?
-
#245 Spoony90 said:
You’re not wrong. But this PTT is useless correct?
It’s not useless, but it isn’t used for any NCEPT purpose. Other hiring methods (NEST, Direct Hire, Academy Placement, sup hiring, etc.) use this data too. OKC was ineligible to release this past panel.
-
#246 Phanatical said:
It’s not useless, but it isn’t used for any NCEPT purpose. Other hiring methods (NEST, Direct Hire, Academy Placement, sup hiring, etc.) use this data too. OKC was ineligible to release this past panel.
We’re gonna be ineligible again next panel. Losing a CPC to be an academy instructor
-
#247 Spoony90 said:
We’re gonna be ineligible again next panel. Losing a CPC to be an academy instructor
It depends when the release date is. If they are still in house through July, you still might be able to.
-
#248 Wondering if I wanted to withdraw from training, and go back to my last facility, if they could use the new CRWG numbers to help me get back there?
-
#249 WavesAndClouds said:
Wondering if I wanted to withdraw from training, and go back to my last facility, if they could use the new CRWG numbers to help me get back there?
Is your last facility below 100% projected? To my knowledge, the CRWG numbers have not yet been incorporated into the PPT.
-
#250 Phanatical said:
Is your last facility below 100% projected? To my knowledge, the CRWG numbers have not yet been incorporated into the PPT.
On the latest ppt yes but in reality they are now above 100 percent projected with a new prior experience inbound. I have heard somewhere that there are different rules for people trying to return back to their previous facility. Not sure where though.
-
#251 WavesAndClouds said:
On the latest ppt yes but in reality they are now above 100 percent projected with a new prior experience inbound. I have heard somewhere that there are different rules for people trying to return back to their previous facility. Not sure where though.
Unless your previous facility was MCO, AUS, CMH, or VGT, then probably not. Even those facilities are still using the old numbers on the unofficial ppt as recently as Wednesday but they did give them special treatment on the ncept panel because their staffing relative to the new crwg numbers is so bad. Other than that, probably have to wait until the crwg numbers are officially implemented.
Acquired Taste said:
Unless your previous facility was MCO, AUS, CMH, or VGT, then probably not. Even those facilities are still using the old numbers on the unofficial ppt as recently as Wednesday but they did give them special treatment on the ncept panel because their staffing relative to the new crwg numbers is so bad. Other than that, probably have to wait until the crwg numbers are officially implemented.
Update: on this week's unofficial ppt, AUS, MCO, CMH, and VGT are all using the new numbers now. All are projected below 67%.
-
#252 Acquired Taste said:
Update: on this week's unofficial ppt, AUS, MCO, CMH, and VGT are all using the new numbers now. All are projected below 67%.
Lmao. Well hey if you're trying to get there they got open spots now!
-
#253 Acquired Taste said:
Unless your previous facility was MCO, AUS, CMH, or VGT, then probably not. Even those facilities are still using the old numbers on the unofficial ppt as recently as Wednesday but they did give them special treatment on the ncept panel because their staffing relative to the new crwg numbers is so bad. Other than that, probably have to wait until the crwg numbers are officially implemented.
Update: on this week's unofficial ppt, AUS, MCO, CMH, and VGT are all using the new numbers now. All are projected below 67%.
So they are picking and choosing who is using the CRWG numbers?
-
#254 HurryUpandWait said:
So they are picking and choosing who is using the CRWG numbers?
Probably a phased rollout to not overload the NCEPT process.
-
#255 July PPT?
-
#256 low.approach22 said:
July PPT?
its on the ncept section of the natca website
-
#257 low.approach22 said:
July PPT?
Can't upload it... Says file is too large...
-
#258 dingalings99 said:
its on the ncept section of the natca website
Good to know, but I’m not apart of natca yet.
-
#259 jorgeluis161 said:
Can't upload it... Says file is too large...
You can delete all months of previous data to make it smaller. Like delete all but the most current 5 months and it'll be good.
Also whoever decided it was a good idea to move all the ppt and placement stuff off ksn to this new SharePoint thing sucks. Making it unnecessarily more difficult to access the data for no good reason.
-
#260 low.approach22 said:
Good to know, but I’m not apart of natca yet.