Priority Placement Tool

Priority Placement Tool February 2024

No permission to download
Overview Updates (95) Reviews (2) History Discussion
This shows OKC at 86 percent but no one got released? Asking cause I have an ERR out. But I wasn’t selected. Nor was I even on the list
 
Spoony90 said:
This shows OKC at 86 percent but no one got released? Asking cause I have an ERR out. But I wasn’t selected. Nor was I even on the list
Click to expand...
I'm going to take a guess that you have a brand new CPC that just got certified in the last month or so. Tell me if I'm wrong.
 
Phanatical said:
It’s not useless, but it isn’t used for any NCEPT purpose. Other hiring methods (NEST, Direct Hire, Academy Placement, sup hiring, etc.) use this data too. OKC was ineligible to release this past panel.
Click to expand...
We’re gonna be ineligible again next panel. Losing a CPC to be an academy instructor
 
Wondering if I wanted to withdraw from training, and go back to my last facility, if they could use the new CRWG numbers to help me get back there?
 
Phanatical said:
Is your last facility below 100% projected? To my knowledge, the CRWG numbers have not yet been incorporated into the PPT.
Click to expand...
On the latest ppt yes but in reality they are now above 100 percent projected with a new prior experience inbound. I have heard somewhere that there are different rules for people trying to return back to their previous facility. Not sure where though.
 
WavesAndClouds said:
On the latest ppt yes but in reality they are now above 100 percent projected with a new prior experience inbound. I have heard somewhere that there are different rules for people trying to return back to their previous facility. Not sure where though.
Click to expand...
Unless your previous facility was MCO, AUS, CMH, or VGT, then probably not. Even those facilities are still using the old numbers on the unofficial ppt as recently as Wednesday but they did give them special treatment on the ncept panel because their staffing relative to the new crwg numbers is so bad. Other than that, probably have to wait until the crwg numbers are officially implemented.

Acquired Taste said:
Unless your previous facility was MCO, AUS, CMH, or VGT, then probably not. Even those facilities are still using the old numbers on the unofficial ppt as recently as Wednesday but they did give them special treatment on the ncept panel because their staffing relative to the new crwg numbers is so bad. Other than that, probably have to wait until the crwg numbers are officially implemented.
Click to expand...
Update: on this week's unofficial ppt, AUS, MCO, CMH, and VGT are all using the new numbers now. All are projected below 67%.
 
Acquired Taste said:
Unless your previous facility was MCO, AUS, CMH, or VGT, then probably not. Even those facilities are still using the old numbers on the unofficial ppt as recently as Wednesday but they did give them special treatment on the ncept panel because their staffing relative to the new crwg numbers is so bad. Other than that, probably have to wait until the crwg numbers are officially implemented.


Update: on this week's unofficial ppt, AUS, MCO, CMH, and VGT are all using the new numbers now. All are projected below 67%.
Click to expand...
So they are picking and choosing who is using the CRWG numbers?
 

Similar threads

J
Priority placement tool questions
Replies
1
Views
1K
doodii
doodii
A
February (Q2) 2024
28 29 30
Replies
587
Views
94K
Maverick
M
mr.k99
Aeromedical is Broken
Replies
4
Views
1K
Phillyman2633
Phillyman2633
L
FAA Reauth is Passed
3 4 5
Replies
98
Views
12K
Logical_Mongoose
Logical_Mongoose
P
August (Q4) 2023
14 15 16
Replies
311
Views
60K
Mr. Mack
Mr. Mack
Back
Top Bottom