Elections have consequences.Love him or hate him some of y’all owe Lenny an apology…
JD wouldn't have extended.
Elections have consequences.Love him or hate him some of y’all owe Lenny an apology…
With the amount of money this union spends couldn’t they hire an A team of lawyers to prepare for negotiations?Is NATCA going to extend anytime a Republican wins now? It's unacceptable to say you'll renegotiate then act like some 5% training raise is a win and extend. I say 5% because Rich got 20% and once that was done they were never going to take it away.
If the TCI gets changed drastically and we see an overwhelming increase of upgrades then sure I'll be on team NATCA. But it's doubtful. The union is too busy using money on partying than doing useful things.
They would rather spend money on partiesWith the amount of money this union spends couldn’t they hire an A team of lawyers to prepare for negotiations?
lol. Yeah just reopen, that’s how that works.What's the down side of this again? We are protected if Trump does his anti-Union EOs, and if he doesn't, we reopen when ever.
Wow…https://www.natca.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/NATCA-LEADER-Briefing-FINAL-12-20-24.pdf
All explained nice and neat
We had daily emails and YouTube videos from NDJH and he can’t even face the membership face to face. Letting his poor fac reps do the leg workhttps://www.natca.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/NATCA-LEADER-Briefing-FINAL-12-20-24.pdf
All explained nice and neat
I will say 1.6% should carry over to any new facility. Imagine the trainees that lost potentially 2+ 1.6 raises at their facility from COVID. Add that to a 20 year career and it’s laughable.
We has 2 out of 3 people who wouldn’t extend and they elected the 1 that wouldElections have consequences.
JD wouldn't have extended.
Someone help me with this timeline of events.https://www.natca.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/NATCA-LEADER-Briefing-FINAL-12-20-24.pdf
All explained nice and neat
It also said day 1 pay mou and no way we'd extend like rich would. But that's what grifters doSomeone help me with this timeline of events.
Page 13 says “WE contacted the agency to inquire whether the administrator might be willing to extend the slate book”.
Next bullet says at the Strategic Leadership Meeting WE received a message the Agency was willing to sign.
Next bullet: lots of words
Next page and next bullet: Prior to the start of the Strategic Leadership Meeting the President met with the EVP to explain the offer from the Agency.
Next bullet which I think is important: NEB meeting where the NEB “ultimately understood the decision made by our President”
But I’m confused. It says prior to the strategic leadership meeting Nick briefed Mick on the Agency offer but it also says the agreement was made at the strategic leadership meeting?
Sure but rich was the most likely to actually listen to the members. Not to mention Nick had been holding up anything rich tried to do since his boys were the majority of the NEB.For what? Rich and the union had been laying the groundwork for this for years.
My RVP is saying they were never consulted and this was 100% just Nick. This document says the RVPs were consulted. I honestly wonder which is right.https://www.natca.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/NATCA-LEADER-Briefing-FINAL-12-20-24.pdf
All explained nice and neat
what region?My RVP is saying they were never consulted and this was 100% just Nick. This document says the RVPs were consulted. I honestly wonder which is right.
Bullshit. Everyone is culpable. Or they deserve to be ousted because they are going along with it.My RVP is saying they were never consulted and this was 100% just Nick. This document says the RVPs were consulted. I honestly wonder which is right.