I was moderately skeptical of this whole thing, especially based on the time line.
Now I think it's complete bullshit. Someone explain how 3 RVPs "killed" a motion prior to there being a vote? If this was brought to the NEB as an untimely, it would need a second to get to a vote to be heard. As Mick points out, you would need a 3/4 majority yea vote to then hear the motion.
In my head, one of two things happened.
1) The was a motion to hear an untimely which would create this workgroup. There was no second to get to a vote to hear the motion. Mick, why didn't you second the motion?????? How about the other RVPs?
2) This was never actually a motion to be considered by the NEB, and Mick/Santa are trying to fabricate something to make their opponent look bad. If they are so outraged by this supposed killing of a workgroup, why wait 18 months to bring it up?
This reaks of bullshit.