- Messages
- 6
- Facility
- ILM Wilmington Tower
Apparently the main cause is not being able to control nerves according to a couple students from the recent graduating class.
Promising as in a decent amount of folks passing?Didn't hear any promising news coming from the class currently taking their evals
It's been the same PA/PV problems for years. There should be no surprises for someone taking a PA unless you create a situation yourself.I have heard others say that the problems and the grading are harder. Trying to convince myself the "bottom of the barrel" theory is right though haha.
The results were fine the last couple years with OTS hiring. They have to have done something recently with the scoring/evaluations
This is probably the saddest aspect of it in my opinion. The FAA threw out millions funding these CTI schools and did not give them any core guidelines or guidance for how to train their students. This left a wide and I mean WIDE range in terms of the quality of education. Some CTI schools simply had book work, others spend a year + in Sims. For instance, the one I went to back in the day had a full semester of Tower Sim, Non Radar, and Radar sims. We worked the exact academy airspace. In it's hay day, there were multiple rounds of 'cuts' prior to even making it into the Sims. If you didn't pass a Sim class, you were done. In my eyes, this is how a CTI school should run. I would love to see the numbers broken down by CTI school from say 2009-2012. I'd expect to see a vast difference from top to bottom.2. Lower percentage of new-hires from the good CTI schools (UND, Riddle, Beaver, etc.),
Both groups are no longer around in significant numbers to prop up the passing average.
The en-route program has had the same pass rate for a long time because there is almost no one with prior center experience going through the Academy, and the CTI schools were more concentrated on the terminal program. Result there was not much of an advantage over an OTS hire.
I want to say there was some report that included those stats. Maybe the Barrier Analysis?I would love to see the numbers broken down by CTI school from say 2009-2012. I'd expect to see a vast difference from top to bottom.
Hallelujah (if that's actually true)A friend of mine knows one of the graduates from that class and their list didn't include SJU. I think he said his friend is going to MLU though.
As of last night when he asked him that's what he was leaning towards so I'd say it's a good chance he heads your way.Hallelujah (if that's actually true)
I would assume its because the SJU people failed right? Those were set aside for specific students.A friend of mine knows one of the graduates from that class and their list didn't include SJU. I think he said his friend is going to MLU though.
Also they do the mandatory selection at the top based on a % of the total list. So if the list gets cut down to 5 students there will be 10 choices and top 3 should be mandatory selections.So if only 5 passed, does that automatically mean that the first 5 facilities on the "Air Traffic New Hire Placement List - Terminal" from KSN will get these few graduates? Basically SJU (2), PHF (1), ALO (1), and BIS (1)?
Yeah I'm not sure but that's likely. This is the list that my buddy sent me.I would assume its because the SJU people failed right? Those were set aside for specific students.
ok my mistake, its a % of graduates not choices so if 5 passed then only 1 would be mandatory and the list will have 10 facilities on it. And thats just the OG list they get a week ahead of time so its no surprise SJU isn't on there. So based off this info there's no way to tell if the OCONUS student passed yet.Yeah I'm not sure but that's likely. This is the list that my buddy sent me.