Shoot The Breeze

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please go look up the definition of socialism. Socialism is literally the government controlling the means of production and distribution. The only kool-aid I have drank is from the fucking dictionary.

socialism | Definition, History, Types, Examples, & Facts

socialism definition - Google Search

Also, what countries have a "democratic socialist system". Please cite sources.
America?USA? We all contribute resources for schools/roads/federal agencies via taxes.

The government controls real estate transactions (Freddie/Fannie), collection of taxes for distribution of vaccines, subsidies for banks, farmers, there might even be federal employees in here? America is democratic and socialist.

I await your response how it's not socialism
 
America?USA? We all contribute resources for schools/roads/federal agencies via taxes.

The government controls real estate transactions (Freddie/Fannie), collection of taxes for distribution of vaccines, subsidies for banks, farmers, there might even be federal employees in here? America is democratic and socialist.

I await your response how it's not socialism
Under socialism the government would own the real estate, it owns the farm, it owns the pharma companies etc. Our capitalistic economy has many justified "social" safety nets and regulations. I don't argue against some of them. They are necessary, as a pure capitalistic system does not work. American is neither democratic (It's a republic) nor socialist.
 
Under socialism the government would own the real estate, it owns the farm, it owns the pharma companies etc. Our capitalistic economy has many justified "social" safety nets and regulations. I don't argue against some of them. They are necessary, as a pure capitalistic system does not work. American is neither democratic (It's a republic) nor socialist.
And they pay us lmfao
 
Under socialism the government would own the real estate, it owns the farm, it owns the pharma companies etc. Our capitalistic economy has many justified "social" safety nets and regulations. I don't argue against some of them. They are necessary, as a pure capitalistic system does not work. American is neither democratic (It's a republic) nor socialist.
Republic I agree with.

They do own an effton of mortgages, small business loans, etc
Doesn't the government subsidizing certain foods control production?
 
Last edited:
Republic I agree with.

They do own an effton of mortgages, small business loans, etc
Doesn't the government subsidizing certain foods control production?
Knowing people in the ag industry, yes. The gov pays farmers to NOT produce anything almost as often as they subsidize production in fact. The American ag industry wouldn't be the international powerhouse it is without those evil tax dollars propping it up, paying ecologists to do environmental studies, and protecting land erosion with CRP programs.

Middle America loves to go on about muh red menace, while ignoring that fact. The cognitive dissonance is wild, particularly when you drive thru these areas and see the signs and bumper stickers on these people's properties and cars.

I say those lazy farmers should quit taking handouts it's making them lazy
 
I don’t see how that affects what I said…?

A new day brings new facts putting more left wing conspiracy theories to bed. What will tomorrow bring?

Of course you don't. What was I thinking?
 
Of course you don't. What was I thinking?
You guys really are something. I post evidence of my claims, and instead of providing counter evidence supporting your counter claims, I get logical fallacies and eyeroll emojis. Is this what giving up looks like?
 
You guys really are something. I post evidence of my claims, and instead of providing counter evidence supporting your counter claims, I get logical fallacies and eyeroll emojis. Is this what giving up looks like?
A-this is the internet
B-this is an aviation forum
Logic would dictate there are some things we aren't going to solve
 
A-this is the internet
B-this is an aviation forum
Logic would dictate there are some things we aren't going to solve
There's a lot of sexual tension in this thread that I think needs to be banged out at the next NATCA convention. 32andbelow what size gimp suit you wear?
 
So shooting the shit is what this is.

air traffic question. You have a guy established on the holding procedure for an approach at 5000. The crossing restrictions are 2000 and 1500. ILS approach. What do you need to tell the pilot for it to be a legal clearance for the approach. My understanding is since he is established on the holding procedure on the approach all you have to say is “cleared ILS rwy xx approach “
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom