breakaway2000
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,693
4th quarter 2017
- Thread starter MJ
- Start date
CaptainObvious
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 2,246
It's because they never updated the color column from the previous color system. That's why yellow is still there.
Quoting myself! Whoot.
I'm guessing it has to do with:
IMPORTANT:As of 3rd quarter 2017, "Exempt" status is no longer in use. The legacy definition follows. A facility may meet the criteria to be considered category 1 or 2, and still be ineligible to release anyone. This is referred to as "Cat 1/2 exempt". This occurs because of the requirement for a release not to drop AOB or projected staffing below the national average, and in an exempt facility, a selection causes that to happen.
breakaway2000
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,693
Negative, the old definition of 'green' which they are still using on the PPT is "within 5% of the national average". Your facility is within 5% of the national average, but either your current or projected CPC% is below the national, which is why you currently can't release people.
from what I understand from your question, if the 2 controllers are from the same facility applying to a mutually desired facility, whoever had their paperwork in first gets released, with the assumption there are more slots than ERR requests. If there are more eligible ERR requests than slots, than ATM rankings come into play.
CaptainObvious
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 2,246
The first one in gets the first release date. Not gets selected. First one with papers in only matters if both are selected.
- Messages
- 3,263
AC is correct. Or was. Until this last panel, manager ranking was optional. Now it is mandatory, so that should be the tie breaker.
breakaway2000
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,693
Exactly...and the FacRep. Do enough to set you apart from the other person at your facility.
So we basically have to get people trained and then they'll start releasing? Or is it more of a numbers game where we need more people to pick up and then releases happen? Sorry, I'm uneducated about the intricate details. Thanks!
breakaway2000
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,693
If I remember your facility correctly, you're currently sitting at 82% current and 95.2% projected. You need one additional person to certify (assuming no one else leaves or retires before the PPT is run in late August) to be eligible.
Thanks. Probably ain't gonna happen. A few washing now. Dang it. At least we are closer. Lol
breakaway2000
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,693
There seems to be a decent amount of errors in the 6/28 PPT. I noticed it with my facility and then the few others I looked at.
Depending on where you are in the process you are counted twice, once as an outbound/inbound and once as a placement list inbound/outbound.
Ex. I'm counted as two outbounds (once on the Committed outbounds and once as a placement list outbound) and two inbounds (once on their committed inbounds and once as their placement list inbounds). If you're counted twice the projected national average shouldn't change, but the facility staffing percentages are inaccurate.
Depending on where you are in the process you are counted twice, once as an outbound/inbound and once as a placement list inbound/outbound.
Ex. I'm counted as two outbounds (once on the Committed outbounds and once as a placement list outbound) and two inbounds (once on their committed inbounds and once as their placement list inbounds). If you're counted twice the projected national average shouldn't change, but the facility staffing percentages are inaccurate.
breakaway2000
Forum Sage
- Messages
- 1,693
Absolutely, it's verbatim off the KSN, just poor data management on their part.
CaptainObvious
Legendary Member
- Messages
- 2,246
I find it somewhat odd that the AOB national average hasn't changed in months. Our facility has swung from 63% to 77% to 63 and back to 71% all in the last six months. Yet the whole time it's been a constant 82%.
- Messages
- 3,263
It's posted here. NCEPT - Facility Priority and Vacancy list
