If a facility trains all radar positions combined (RD, HO, Approach1, Approach2), could a trainee be certified on one or two of those positions independently prior to the others?
Our facility differentiates all 4 positions in the SOP, it is just understood they are trained combined, and we currently only certify when it’s deemed they can work all positions combined (they’re typically worked combined, but not always). Would it be strange to train someone on 4 positions combined, and during that time say “ok you are recommended on position 1/2 but not 3/4”.
If we certified trainees on RD/HO they should technically meet the requirement of D3 per the slate book Appendix B. , “FD+66% of all other positions”. No one at our facility has done this or been given D3 in a very, very long time. We jump from D2-CPC which often takes 1 year or more.
My goal here is to understand if that’s something we should pursue, or something other facilities do. Or is the additional paperwork, currency requirement once they’d be certified on RD/HO, etc., not worth it.
Our facility differentiates all 4 positions in the SOP, it is just understood they are trained combined, and we currently only certify when it’s deemed they can work all positions combined (they’re typically worked combined, but not always). Would it be strange to train someone on 4 positions combined, and during that time say “ok you are recommended on position 1/2 but not 3/4”.
If we certified trainees on RD/HO they should technically meet the requirement of D3 per the slate book Appendix B. , “FD+66% of all other positions”. No one at our facility has done this or been given D3 in a very, very long time. We jump from D2-CPC which often takes 1 year or more.
My goal here is to understand if that’s something we should pursue, or something other facilities do. Or is the additional paperwork, currency requirement once they’d be certified on RD/HO, etc., not worth it.
Last edited: