lol that was actually the incredibly kind version of how I really felt about that comment.
I was writing a reply to your first comment, but I'll tie it all in. In your above comment, if you wonder how some classes pass 4/18, 5/17, etc, look no further then A and B above. Professionalism goes a long way, are you going to help someone differently if you like or don't like them? If you truly don't care if someone passes/fails, then you certainly wouldn't go out of your way to help them either.
If A and B are present above, this has a strong potential to happen. Back in the day, my class passed 100%. 5 people had no business passing, but the rest of us essentially would not let them fail. Some struggled with phraseology and vocal speed. I spent hours making voice recognition instructions with every Academy call sign for ground and local control so they could study and practice on their own (I added a 4 second pause after each so if they couldn't think and talk fast enough the next transmission would start). We made sure everyone memorized every available call sign so if you only caught a partial, you knew exactly who it was. Early on, we saw instructors 'parroting' them, we cut that shit out before the 2nd problem in the sims. We made every scenario, every decision, black and white, there was no mystery, no ambiguity. Even when it came time to take our finals, I had no idea how they would do, but we had done everything we possibly could to put them in a situation to be successful. They all passed and it's a great feeling knowing you potentially helped them start an incredible career and what that means for their families/kids etc.
As far as systematic stuff goes, this is my biggest issue with the new hiring practice. You no longer have a healthy mix of students with applicable military experience, contract/DOD tower experience, or experience from the powerhouse CTI schools that have the skill, knowledge, and ability to help others early enough to make a difference.