I'm so sick of hearing everyone saying what will natca give up as if a union is supposed to give up anything, a unions whole job is to constantly fight for better working conditions/pay
And how the UAW most recently handled their strike tactics are a blueprint for how a lot of national labor organizations should be handling negotiations:
UAW made their demands.
Big 3 balked, stalled, and thought they would call bluff.
UAW initiated strikes at select facilities to display strength and mobility.
Big 3 immediately gave concessions.
Both parties came back to negotiations and moved on to other items.
Negotiations broke down on different demands.
UAW expanded strike to other critical profit centers.
Big 3 gave more concessions.
Both parties came back to the table and resumed negotiations.
Negotiations broke down again.
UAW expanded strike to largest profit centers for Big 3; still only mobilizing a small percentage of their members.
Big 3 gave more concessions; albeit smaller concessions.
UAW leadership believed they squeezed as much as they could without damaging long-term relations and put the new contract to a vote.
Non-UAW automakers immediately gave raises and increased benefits to their non-unionized workforce because the UAWs threat and effectiveness was that tangible. UAW is now attempting to unionize as many of those places because they are already planning for when the contract expires and know their power if they have 20% higher membership to call upon to walk the line.
NATCA, if led properly, is in a position to give up
nothing and gain
everything. It doesn't take a MENSA-level IQ; just enough intelligence to know when you have the upper hand, enough leverage to use it, and enough charm to do it all with a smile on your face.
Words of wisdom from the syphilitic brain of Al Capone: "You can get farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone."