So few people qualify for A124 and even fewer invoke it I guarantee the FAA doesn't care about it at allJust the rumor mill, but the only reason I heard for extending was to keep article 124 since the FAA wants to get rid of it
So few people qualify for A124 and even fewer invoke it I guarantee the FAA doesn't care about it at allJust the rumor mill, but the only reason I heard for extending was to keep article 124 since the FAA wants to get rid of it
"Care" doesn't really factor into it. The problem is that management rarely goes along with an ask without asking something else in return. You could have a great idea that benefits everyone and still have the agency use your desire for it as leverage against you.So few people qualify for A124 and even fewer invoke it I guarantee the FAA doesn't care about it at all
The middle managers that don’t have any say in anything. The ones at the top, very differentIdk why anyone thinks the managers would be against us getting a raise. Then they’d have to get a raise to make more than us.
What do they care?The middle managers that don’t have any say in anything. The ones at the top, very different
Tons and tons of people qualify for A124. Few invoke it. It’s slowly growing. Will likely continue to grow as long as staffing is short and the release policy keeps people trapped. But clearly most senior 10-12s don’t want to relocate. And moving downgrade within the same locale is often a huge pay cut.So few people qualify for A124 and even fewer invoke it I guarantee the FAA doesn't care about it at all
Who knows. Power? Ego? Why do all the OMs pretend like any benefit to local working conditions comes right out of their own pocket?What do they care?
I don’t like how his mouth moves and his weird lamb chop sideburn beard combo. Does he think he’s Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine?RAZEWEN?¿
It does include ingrade, but I 1000000% agree on +/- 2 levels. Get rid of the restriction on hardships too. It’s the controller’s fault for not certifying at the facility they hardshipped to.I'd like to see Article 60 revamped that way the people who are trapped at black hole facilities that are hard to escape from get a chance to possibly move on. Maybe ingrade or +2 levels, something. You put in the time whether you want to or not, might as well try something for those people.
Yeah I meant ingrade and +2. The +/- 2 is better.It does include ingrade, but I 1000000% agree on +/- 2 levels. Get rid of the restriction on hardships too. It’s the controller’s fault for not certifying at the facility they hardshipped to.
What hardship restriction is this in reference toIt does include ingrade, but I 1000000% agree on +/- 2 levels. Get rid of the restriction on hardships too. It’s the controller’s fault for not certifying at the facility they hardshipped to.
The cap of +3 levels.What hardship restriction is this in reference to
Social club gonna social clubHere we go in solidarity again for everyone else but their own. NATCA sure does good recognizing other unions trying to negotiate but can’t fight the good fight anymore. What about those airline profits NATCA??? And everyone else making a profit on the backs of controllers day in and day out. Raise when?
Honestly idk how you fix A99. The union would never support losing it. Of course, they shouldn’t.The cap of +3 levels.
You present a good point Move78.Honestly idk how you fix A99. The union would never support losing it. Of course, they shouldn’t.
The NRP turned it into the most scammed article in the contract.
Receiving facilities don’t like being forced to take someone either.
You don’t have to be CPC to hardship, so it would explode without a cap, every new hire would just file for a 12 as a level 5 academy grad.
Let’s be honest NATCA has been neutered since the white book and their push for collaboration. Mick is pointing out the lack of focus on our pay and how we are falling behind. Let’s see if they can step up or continue to be a social club that wants their hands in everything, CWG, blah blah what people need and want is more pay and better working conditions….less OT and less 6 day workweeks.How dare NATCA support other unions! They haven't met every unreasonable demand of the randos on this forum.
I'm honestly wondering how many of you are actually management just trying to stir shit.