4th quarter 2017

[Bigfella]

One would think they are just updating the eligible losses and gains based on the new policy put into effect yesterday but we've seen in the past the Priority list and numbers get changed. I'm hoping this isn't the case as I've got a realistic chance of getting out this round.

 

[Move78]

One would think they are just updating the eligible losses and gains based on the new policy put into effect yesterday but we've seen in the past the Priority list and numbers get changed. I'm hoping this isn't the case as I've got a realistic chance of getting out this round.

Oh my friggin gahd I will friggin kill someone's face, first friggin face I see.

 

[Mike Kilo]

Better resign yourselves to your current facilities!!!! I recommend a look at MSS-2 bids........lol.

 

[Move78]

New PPT yesterday btw. Looks like updated the possible losses column.
@MJ

 

[AlphaLima]

More so than NATCA, with the attitude of "no one promised you that you can move"

No one promised me but the sole reason i accepted this entire state when i applied (as it was state applications when i applied) was because the old program existed. I never would have accepted this position in the current state of affairs. And to rub it in even hard everything else being equal if i was a new higher now i would have had my choice since i was in the top 3 of my class and not come here, or since i was prior experience gotten to skip the academy and gone to a tower anywhere else.

I just hate that attitude they have like they all of a sudden work for the agency, not us.

 

[X-Ray Lima]

Can a CPC-IT and/or a developmental ERR under this new policy?

 

[AlphaLima]

I dont see why CPC-ITs would be treated different. But devs fall under section 6.

https://www.natca.org/images/Facrep_Corner/Labor_Relations/NCEPT/2017NRPFINALMay2017.pdf

Section 6. Facility certified CPC’s shall be considered for placement prior to other employees during the ERR placement process. Employees in training that have never achieved CPC status will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

 

[SugarFoot1]

I dont see why CPC-ITs would be treated different. But devs fall under section 6.

https://www.natca.org/images/Facrep_Corner/Labor_Relations/NCEPT/2017NRPFINALMay2017.pdf

Section 6. Facility certified CPC’s shall be considered for placement prior to other employees during the ERR placement process. Employees in training that have never achieved CPC status will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Yea this is a touchy subject for someone on here. I would be upset also

 

[breakaway2000]

I dont see why CPC-ITs would be treated different. But devs fall under section 6.

https://www.natca.org/images/Facrep_Corner/Labor_Relations/NCEPT/2017NRPFINALMay2017.pdf

Section 6. Facility certified CPC’s shall be considered for placement prior to other employees during the ERR placement process. Employees in training that have never achieved CPC status will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Both can submit ERRs. Per section 6, CPC-IT's are not facility certified at their current location and shall be considered after all facility rated CPCs. As @SugarFoot1 eluded to, what is written and what is applied are two completely different things.

 

[wikdevo]

Just curious how they figure out the priority staffing list. How can ATL be so high but they can't pick up a single soul...

 

[Move78]

Just curious how they figure out the priority staffing list. How can ATL be so high but they can't pick up a single soul...

It's a formula called the Decision Lense Criteria. It's made out of prayers, chants and magic and forged in dragon fire.

 

[rugbydog11]

It's a formula called the Decision Lense Criteria. It's made out of prayers, chants and magic and forged in dragon fire.

I thought you were joking at first, but then I saw dragon fire and knew it was a true statement. Winter is here.

 

[breakaway2000]

I thought you were joking at first, but then I saw dragon fire and knew it was a true statement. Winter is here.

Omegashare is basically the King of the North

 

[breakaway2000]

Quick facts for the upcoming panel...

233 eligible releases from 121 facilities (71 facilities can only release 1)
98 eligible facilities can select up to 521 people (Removed N90/C90/Guam)

In terms of how the new 85% rule has effected movement, the before stats are above. Now...
479 eligible releases from 163 facilities (70 facilities can only release 1)
Facilities eligible to select remain the same.
Flood.Gates.Open.

 

[AlphaLima]

The fact that we're considering 4.4% of the CPC number eligible flood gates, that incredibly depressing.

 

[breakaway2000]

The fact that we're considering 4.4% of the CPC number eligible flood gates, that incredibly depressing.

In terms of eligible ERRs, 6,106 CPCs have the ability to submit an eligible ERR. That's light-years away from what it was for the first year and a half and is the main basis for the flood gates comment.

 

[Bigfella]

Has there been a new priority list published?

 

[corn4ahead]

Not as of 2 eastern.

 

[Move78]

Omegashare is basically the King of the North

Has there been a new priority list published?

If that damn revised priority list doesn't look perfectly flawlessly 100% identical top to bottom then Omegahare is gonna be the King of a Northern psych ward.

 

[breakaway2000]

Has there been a new priority list published?

Not as of 2 eastern.

Not as of 5pm eastern