December (Q1) 2020

[Super Salt]

Submission deadline: 18 Nov
PPT/NCEPT Data: 27 Nov
ATM ranking: 9-13 Dec
Panel: 19 Dec

Selection list attached

managers ranking list December (Q1) 2020

 

[flying_dutchman]

Are we thinking maybe January or February for the next panel?

 

[Flyaboveall]

December since they only had 2 this year ?

 

[Shikaka]

I would assume Decemberish, since they made it clear they don't want to interrupt the quarterly panels. Unless of course the government shuts down in November...

 

[Maverick]

Any news on this yet or still too soon?

 

[But_I_Had_Visual]

Please allow time for more dynamic decisions

 

[Super Salt]

Changes (temporary) coming to next panel:

Losing facility has to be at or above 100% current AND projected staffing.

Gaining facility has to be at or below 60% current staffing.

Trainee-to-controller ratio has to be below 25%.

 

[CLRD4TO]

I would not be surprised by a Jan/Feb date.
However, every year that there has been a Sep bid there was a Dec one.

 

[CaptainObvious]

Changes (temporary) coming to next panel:

Losing facility has to be at or above 100% current AND projected staffing.

Gaining facility has to be at or below 60% current staffing.

Trainee-to-controller ratio has to be below 25%.

 

[CLRD4TO]

Confirmed by someone that sits on the NCEPT panel. Dates SHOULD be posted tomorrow for FYQ1.

 

[Mike Kilo]

Confirmed by someone that sits on the NCEPT panel. Dates SHOULD be posted tomorrow for FYQ1.

Q1 would support the possibility of A December panel right? Could be good news!

 

[Shikaka]

And the initial facilities that can select are... A80, C90, HIO, HTS, JFK, LGA, LVK, M98, MIA, NCT, S46...

 

[Mike Kilo]

M98 has soooo many trainees right now. Idk how they could select.

 

[Roger_Roger]

And the initial facilities that can select are... A80, C90, HIO, HTS, JFK, LGA, LVK, M98, MIA, NCT, S46...

Didnt we go through this last panel with the 18 or so facilities people said could pick up people and more facilities had selections when the panel was done?

 

[Shikaka]

Didnt we go through this last panel with the 18 or so facilities people said could pick up people and more facilities had selections when the panel was done?

Yeah, but the 18 were the majority, and the others were "dynamic" choices. Partial idea is better than no idea.

 

[Maverick]

Yeah, but the 18 were the majority, and the others were "dynamic" choices. Partial idea is better than no idea.

The priority list looks about the same as the last. At least the top 10

 

[Move78]

Yeah, but the 18 were the majority, and the others were "dynamic" choices. Partial idea is better than no idea.

The "dynamic" phraseology, how ever funny, really just refers to the union convincing the agency to allow another movement into a receiving facility above that's above 85% but below natl avg.

 

[Roger_Roger]

Yeah, but the 18 were the majority, and the others were "dynamic" choices. Partial idea is better than no idea.

Those dynamic choices led to facilities that could have selected multiple people not picking up the numbers they could gain even though my facility could release so there is no rhyme or reason.

The priority list looks about the same as the last. At least the top 10

Yeah wheres philly

 

[Shikaka]

Those dynamic choices led to facilities that could have selected multiple people not picking up the numbers they could gain even though my facility could release so there is no rhyme or reason.

Yeah no shit, everything was finally working out and my choice was cut down by 3...everyone is aware of it

 

[Maverick]

Yeah wheres philly

4