- Messages
- 3,157
End of the monthWhen does the facility priority list get published?
End of the monthWhen does the facility priority list get published?
Both AOB and proj have to be above 90. Categories are listed on the ppt. All this info is in the MOU.I'm new to this whole thing... If my facility's cpc to target is above 90.1 they have to let me go in 3 month or less if selected?
For more detail as far as what to look for, I will bet that person is caught in limbo. The person in charge of your staffing workbook updated it accordingly, but they're still listed as a CPC-IT or DEV by HR. If they go into the SWB and click on that person they'll be able to see if there's a discrepancy. Although rare, when there is, that person is not counted as anything (CPC, trainee, etc.). Your RVP can help assist in getting it correctly updated, but if you can diagnose the problem, it helps.
Is the new list out?Tfw none of the facilties you have in for can select anyone in the first round.
Breakaway posted the ppt that they’ll be using for the panel one page back. No updated facility priority list yet.Is the new list out?
We've been at the same amount of CPC (9) for the last 5 months or so, yet our "releases" seem to be fluctuating up and down every month. In March we had 9 CPC and we released one on Ncept in April, then a couple weeks after that (In April), another certified. Now we have 9 CPC but releases say 0. (Target 11).
We do have one leaving the agency next month, but didn't think that should affect the May numbers.
Could this be because of a % change to the national average? It shows us below the necessary % figure, but we released someone on last Ncept with exact same staffing.
Is there an archive of the month-to-month staffing numbers that we find in the resources section?
TIA
The releases from all of the facilities with 9 CPC's with a target number of 11 should not have happened last panel.We've been at the same amount of CPC (9) for the last 5 months or so, yet our "releases" seem to be fluctuating up and down every month. In March we had 9 CPC and we released one on Ncept in April, then a couple weeks after that (In April), another certified. Now we have 9 CPC but releases say 0. (Target 11).
We do have one leaving the agency next month, but didn't think that should affect the May numbers.
Could this be because of a % change to the national average? It shows us below the necessary % figure, but we released someone on last Ncept with exact same staffing.
Is there an archive of the month-to-month staffing numbers that we find in the resources section?
TIA
Do we know what the reasoning was for letting those releases happen in April or was it just a lucky oversight?The releases from all of the facilities with 9 CPC's with a target number of 11 should not have happened last panel.
Ex.
81.9% - CPC National Average for April Panel
81.8% - CPC Percentage for above mentioned facilities
Historical CPC National Average
April Panel - 81.9%
February Panel - 81.8%
December Panel 81.8%
The PPT that was released in April showed each of those facilities being able to release 0, however, when the final facility priority list was published, it showed each of those facilities being able to lose 1 body. An NCEPT miracle if you will. As long as the CPC national average continues to climb (currently at 82.1%), those facilities with a target number of 11 will have to get to 10 CPC's to satisfy the CPC average portion of the NCEPT release policy.
Probably a lucky oversight. They also forgot to do the April recatagorizing for Cat 2 facilities that became Cat 1 and had people awaiting Cat 2 releases and a whole bunch of extra people were selected Cat 1 by mistake.Do we know what the reasoning was for letting those releases happen in April or was it just a lucky oversight?
I don't see how it's possible to have mistakes on an automated spreadsheet where you just plug numbers in.The closer you watch all of this unfold the move oversights you notice on the Agency side of things, mistakes are very common.
It's my understanding the SWB manual data entries that are constantly butchered are all from the Agency (HR and ATM)I don't see how it's possible to have mistakes on an automated spreadsheet where you just plug numbers in.
Gotta love the buffoons running this show on both sides.
10-12's, 0 gains means 0 gains.Can someone explain how LAS and ATL are 9 and 10 but both list possible gains as 0? Are they really unable to pick people up? I am trying to get closer to family and we can finally release 1 controller but every facility I have ERR's into show a 0 as possible gains.
0 picks means their projected staffing is above the national averageCan someone explain how LAS and ATL are 9 and 10 but both list possible gains as 0? Are they really unable to pick people up? I am trying to get closer to family and we can finally release 1 controller but every facility I have ERR's into show a 0 as possible gains.
Yep. But it still makes no sense why their priority formula doesn't move the facilities that can't select anyone down to the bottom of the list.0 picks means they're projected staffing is above the national average